Expose Them All

LINK

Hundreds of Israeli occupation troops stormed a Palestinian orphanage and a boarding school in the southern West Bank City of Hebron early Thursday, looting large amounts of frozen food, dairy products, clothes, shoes, refrigerators and kitchen equipments, local officials and eyewitnesses said.

The looted material were to be used to feed and cloth as many as seven thousand orphan girls and boys, many of them attending boarding schools run by the Islamic Charitable Society.

According to neighbors, the looting operation started around midnight Wednesday when soldiers stormed the al-Harayek neighborhood in Hebron where the inventory department of the Islamic Charitable Society is located.

“They (Israeli soldiers) forced open the main gate and outer doors and then started loading everything on trucks they brought with them,” said Muhammed Awwad, an official at the Society’s Inventory Department.

“They looted millions of dollars worth of equipments and products, it is an organized robbery, except that it is carried out by the army of a state that claims to be civilized and democratic.”

Awwad said the soldiers seized hundreds of crates of frozen meet, numerous food containers as well as a huge amount of clothes, including Pajamas, underwear, sanitary material, toilet papers, shoes, sport equipment, blankets, mattresses, and handkerchiefs.

“They even looted female children underwear, They robbed us clean.”" Awwad said.

Read the rest here

—————-

‘IDF the most moral army in the world’

“One of the dreams of Zionism was to be a bridge. Instead, we are creating exclusion between the East and the West. Instead of creating bridges; we are contributing to the conflict between East and West by our stupid desire to have more.”

Israeli novelist & playwright Abraham Yehoshua

“We should prepare to go over to the offensive. Our aim is to smash Lebanon, Trans-Jordan, and Syria. The weak point is Lebanon, for the Moslem regime is artificial and easy for us to undermine. We shall establish a Christian state there, and then we will smash the Arab Legion, eliminate Trans-Jordan; Syria will fall to us. We then bomb and move on and take Port Said, Alexandria and Sinai.”

Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion, May 1948

More

The ways of Jewish supremacist treason, treachery and flimflam are a reality as cold and piercing as the point of a knife cutting at the heart of our society and its health, safety and potential for survival. They span out like an eternal unfurling drop-down list of wrongs, all undermining the non-Jew, the European-American and his place at the head of his own table. America’s greatest enemy is not radical Islam or fundamentalist Christianity, but the unspoken threat of Jewish supremacism, its Talmudic Jewish hatred of non-Jews and the political machinations, flair and money of international Zionism. How have they destroyed us in the past and how are they still launching unprovoked broadsides in the present against our freedoms, liberties and ability to resist the toxins they inject into the body politic? Come, let us count the ways.

1. They have pushed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), all of which have served to hollow out America’s manufacturing base. The neo-conservative Jews (former Trotskyites) have substituted their enthusiasm for international Communism with a naïve or malevolent embracing of international capitalism, which is simply an inverted brand of Marxism. It is as utopian and pie-in-the-sky as anything concocted by the old Comintern they once cherished. Of course, these neo-cons care little for the impact that “free trade” policies have had on European-Americans whose jobs are being shipped away to China, Mexico and any other destination where the regulations are sparse and the pay for cheap labor even sparser. All of this “free market” fundamentalism has been the gospel read by many converts in the modern periodical Bibles of neo-conservatism, the Weekly Standard, the American Spectator, the Wall Street Journal and the National Review, all run by Zionist Jews.

2. They have made up the lion’s share of spies and traitors throughout American history. These spies include Harry Dexter White (a crypto-Jew), Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, Harry Gold, Morton Sobel and Jonathan Pollard among many, many others. All of these Jews have compromised American security by passing on our most guarded secrets to nations like the former Soviet Union, China and of course their favorite state, Israel. After the attacks of 9/11, Michael Chertoff, a Zionist Jew and dual citizen of Israel who is the head of Homeland Security, allowed over 100 Israeli spies who had failed lie detector tests and were suspected by the FBI, to leave the United States. They returned to Israel where they were forever out of the reach of American law enforcement. Since this time Jewish espionage has only been emboldened by our complacency and two officials from the American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman have been indicted for passing along secret US documents to Israel.

3. They have accrued a king’s fortune and propagandized an entire generation with the new American religion of Holocaust, converting the masses with the evangelistic outreach of Holocaust films like Schindler’s List, The Diary of Anne Frank or The Pianist. Many Euro-Americans, thanks to these movies, now see the Jews as history’s “premier victims” who have been persecuted without cause, despite the fact that Jews run almost the entire Western media, steer and manipulate its foreign policy and pursue legislation designed to implement a genocide against white people the world over. Due to the lies, half-truths and exaggerated absurdities now attached to the events of the Second World War, Jews currently make up an untouchably holy upper crust, an overclass of elitists who demand absolute obeisance and the curtailment of the rights of non-Jews living within their host country, the United States.

4. They have led the media attack on the American white male, portraying him in TV commercials as a brain-dead buffoon, a cuckolded dunce and a predictable bumbler. He is only saved from his Mr. Magoo-like meanderings by his intelligent wife or a genial and golden-hearted minority, usually an African-American who is educated and amiable. On situation comedies and in Hollywood fare, the white male is either sex-starved and the butt of jokes and disrespect (Married With Children) or a liar, lecher and degenerate (American Beauty). These jaundiced portrayals are crafted by Jewish writers whose views are inimical to our heritage and hostile to our mores and traditional values.

5. They have infiltrated patriotic white nationalist movements, directing their focus away from our real enemy, the Eternal Jew, onto blacks, Mexicans and Muslims. Jewish partisans have even created faux neo-Nazi organizations all for the sole purpose of manufacturing a contrived climate of “hatred” and “intolerance.” For example, Frank Collins, a neo-Nazi who marched through a Jewish community in Skokie, Illinois, was revealed to be Frank Cohen, a crypto-Jew utilized by the Jewish-run American Civil Liberties Union. False flags are the way of Jews and Zionism and arm band-wearing walking stereotypes of National Socialists such as Bill White and others of his ilk who are showered with media attention should be treated with the greatest of suspicion, for many of them are infiltrators bought and paid for by the enemy.

Continues

There is a new trend in home sales called “house swapping”. Homeowners can get it all started online.

Wilma and Allen Sawtelle could not sell their house to local buyers in Pahrump.

Amy and Roy Farr were coming up empty in Cartersville, Georgia.

Amy Farr had a new job in Pahrump, the Sawtelles wanted to move to Georgia, so they traded properties.

It is easy to find the house swapping sites, just Google “house swap” and you will find them.

Be careful if you try this though, because you never know who you are dealing with on the internet.

Experts say you should also get a realtor involved because there are a lot of ways to lose your house and/or a lot of money if you do not know exactly what you are doing.

——————–

Aye be da one wut invented da “crib swap” - iz yo can’t sell da moefukka … trades in fo anotha one. Aye gots mines on de internnet, iz any muahfukka out der wants ta swap ah crib in Vermont fo a crib in East St. Louis, Il., gibs me ah holla. Aye eben toss in ah 1975 Cadillac. It beez in de front yard. Holla at me — > www.muhdik@nigga’sinventdainnternet.com

Gee, wonder why people are having a hard time selling their houses anyway? It’s not like America has been warmongering and fighting the jews enemies in the Mid East and going bankrupt at the same time. And it’s sure not like jews rule the economy and the money. Oh no, gosh, a person would almost think that just because the Federal Reserve is under private jewish hands and it’s not a government entity, like most people think, and this non-federal reserve lends our government money, at interest of course, and that money is printed out of thin air and backed by nothing, that one day, someday, somehow, that in and of itself would cause the economy to falter. Gosh, a person would be racist and anti-Semitic just for thinking such garbage.

Another thing, every drop of oil in the world, at one time, prior to the US/UK/Zionist folly in the Middle East, was traded in dollars. But not anymore, while we “don’t talk about it much” in the Zionist controlled media, nations have fought back against America’s Zionist led warmongering, not by bombs and bullets, but by economic means. Yes, as time goes by, less and less oil is being traded in dollars. That’s how nations fight back against an arrogant, warmongering and out of control “superpower.” That’s why Rome fell, and that’s why America will fall. And of course, like Rome, by allowing hordes of mongrels to invade their nation to keep the people dilly, silly and in a complete stupor.

“House Swapping?” I like the idea and everything, but it’s completely ridiculous to have to go to those extremes. I mean if there’s no money or no one to buy your house, let’s look at the reasons why. And of course the reasons why are because of jews. Let’s “swap” the GD conniving jews out of this country and let’s start fresh and new again. Like when our nation was young and why our nation became a nation in the first place. People fleeing from jewish oppressions and warmongering. People fleeing from jewish orchestrated religious oppression, jewish control of the money which lead to high taxation and jewish bestowed anti-free speech laws. If we ever get rid of the jew with his warmongers ways, with his diversity and multicultural schemes, this country wouldn’t have to resort to house swapping schemes.

Did the above nigger really “invent” the “house swapping” idea? Haha, like as if that’s a legitimate question. Of course the answer is no. The nigger “invented” the home invasion scheme. You know, where a tribe of nigs (or spics) barges in, pistol whips the males, rapes the females and steals all their sh*t? That’s what we have to worry about, we don’t have time to worry about the wily jew, we just don’t have the time. We have to worry about survival.

(Clickable)

Benjamin Ginsberg’s The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State, which deals with the rise and fall of Jews in different societies, is an intellectual bombshell. A liberal American Jew who teaches political science at Johns Hopkins, Ginsberg makes observations about Jewish influence in government and society that would be deemed anti-Semitic if expressed by a Gentile. Ginsberg, however, does not criticize that Jewish power for being harmful to Gentiles; his only concern is the harm it can cause for Jews by provoking Gentiles to anti-Semitic actions.

Outlining Jewish power since the Middle Ages, Ginsberg notes that Jews helped kings expand and centralize their realms; in mediæval Spain, for example, Jews were closely tied to the monarchies, largely, but not solely, in the financial sphere. But they also took the lead in working for the revolutionary destruction of societies hostile to Jews; thus, Jews played key roles in European revolutions, liberal and Communist alike.

In the liberal revolutions and in the development of liberal states, Jews propagandized the public and financed liberal groups. In France, Jews helped establish the Third Republic in the 1870s; their influence loomed especially large in the republic’s anti-clerical campaigns. Jewish financial and media power also provided the underpinning for the Weimar Republic, whose depiction as the Judenrepublik by anti-Semites was not far from the mark. In late 19th-century Britain, the Jewish-dominated press championed imperialism, which benefited Jewish finance. And during the early stages of the Soviet regime, Jews were numerous in leadership positions, especially in the secret police and the propaganda agencies, which they dominated. In contrast to Judeophiles who claim that Jews observe a higher humanitarian ethos, Ginsberg acknowledges that Jewish Communists played a ruthless role in liquidating their opposition.

Ginsberg warns that as a result of their great power, Jews become a highly visible target for the enemies of the regime and often suffer group destruction with the regime’s demise. Thus in the late 15th century, Ferdinand and Isabella expelled the Jews from Spain, where they had occupied key positions under previous monarchs. In Germany, Hitler eliminated the Jews along with the Weimar Republic; what enabled Nazism to succeed was a coalescence of lower- and upper-class opposition to Jewish power. Where such a fusion of divergent classes does not take place, as in the French Third Republic, Jewish power survives despite a high degree of anti-Semitism.

The Jewish fall from power does not always require the demise of a friendly regime. Sometimes a previously hospitable regime will eliminate Jews when they are no longer necessary for the maintenance of power, as was the case in the Soviet Union when Stalin dispensed with Jews. Ginsberg’s fundamental theory is that the Jewish close relationship with the state is a “fatal embrace”: the achievement of great power, and the concomitant high visibility, invite group destruction as situations change.

***

Ginsberg devotes the greatest part of his book to the history of Jewish power in America. German Jews gained significant power in the United States after the Civil War, largely in the realm of finance. Jews financed the U.S. regime’s Civil War debt, the debts of the reconstructed Southern states, and the nascent industries. In essence, according to our author, Jews were a part of the new business and industrial class of the Gilded Age, and became “identified with the worst excesses of the nineteenth-century industrial order.” (p. 75) Jewish prominence induced an anti-Semitic opposition from Southern and Western agrarians (Populists), and from old-stock New England patricians. Reacting to that anti-Semitic criticism, the Gentile business class jettisoned its ties with the Jews and aligned itself with the patricians. Thus, the 1890s saw the emergence both of exclusive clubs that barred Jews and of anti-Jewish quotas in the Ivy League colleges. Having been thrust out of the business elite, Jews sought to alter the American economic system, Ginsberg writes. They identified with the Progressive reform movement and — on the part of the newly immigrating Eastern European Jews — with radical socialism. The Jewish role in the Progressive movement crested in the Wilson administration, with Louis Brandeis playing a major role in the creation of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Trade Commission. However, the Jewish rise was transitory, cut short by the anti-radical Red Scare in the aftermath of World War I, which destroyed radical and reform movements as well as (in Ginsberg’s view) an emerging welfare state.

It was with Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal that Jews gained long-term power in the United States, power that continues into the present. Jews served as Roosevelt’s idea men and staffed his New Deal agencies. They played a fundamental part in fashioning the centralized American welfare state — and Ginsberg asserts that they created it to serve their own interests. In contrast to American Protestants’ success in the private sector, Ginsberg writes that Jews “relied upon the state and the public economy to achieve positions of influence and status in American society.” (p. 103) That account contrasts, we should note, with Thomas Sowell’s portrayal of Jewish success via the free market.

Jews also played a significant role in getting the United States into World War II to destroy their Nazi nemesis. And they worked actively to undermine popular noninterventionist resistance to war. For example, the Anti-Defamation League “employed investigative agents who secretly penetrated isolationist and anti-Semitic organizations and collected potentially damaging or incriminating information” which it turned over to the FBI and other federal agencies. (p. 110) Ginsberg does not develop this point, but given the fact that the overwhelming majority of “isolationists” were not enemy agents and were simply exercising their constitutional right to oppose a policy, it is apparent that activist American Jews have been quite willing to crush the civil liberties of others in order to advance their own goals. Jews also played a critical part in turning the media toward a prowar stance. (That was quite an achievement, since the American mood in the 1930s was strongly antiwar and “isolationist.”) In Hollywood, Jewish film makers concentrated on producing anti-Nazi propaganda films to prepare the masses for a crusade against evil.

In the immediate postwar period, right-wing attacks on Communist subversion put Jews on the defensive. Since Jews had been numerous in the American Communist Party, to them the attacks reeked of anti-Semitism. But by joining forces with the also-imperiled WASP elite, Jews were able to destroy the threat by exercising their media power. They did not just succeed in downplaying the idea of Communist subversion; they were even able to change the issue from Communist subversion to the right-wing threat to American civil liberties. That was quite a striking ideological turnaround from the Jews’ total disregard of the civil liberties of pre-World War II “isolationists.” The Jewish success against the right-wing danger meant that by the late 1950s, “conservative anti-Communists who sought to maintain a modicum of respectability … carefully avoided the least hint of anti-Semitism.” (p. 125) Ginsberg cites William F. Buckley Jr. as an example.

In the 1960s, the Jews played key roles in the civil rights revolution and the concomitant Great Society programs. For Jews, Ginsberg points out, support for black civil rights was not only a “moral commitment” but also an “important political tactic” to weaken the white South and the ethnic machine politicians in the North, and, as a consequence, increase their own relative power within the Democratic coalition. Moreover, the advancement of the concept of “equality of opportunity” bolstered Jewish power throughout society. (pp. 125-26) Jews opposed the Vietnam War because it inhibited the expansion of those liberal Great Society programs in which their power resided.

By the end of the Great Society reforms, Jews, in Ginsberg’s view, had become the major force in American politics and government: “From the 1970s onward, Jews led or were influential in most, though not all, of the political reform, feminist, consumer rights, gay rights, environmentalist and other public interest groups and related foundations, study groups, and think tanks that came to dominate the Democratic party during the 1970s and continue to be the leading forces within that party today.” (p. 137) And Jews wield considerable power in the institutions of the American welfare state, holding as they do prominent positions in the “public or quasi-public economy of government agencies, helping professions, private foundations, think tanks, and universities.” (p. 140) Since Jewish power and wealth is either directly or indirectly tied to the national government, rather than to state and local governments or to the strictly private sector, Jews have a vested interest in its maintenance and expansion. In short, Ginsberg contends, Jews support the liberal welfare state for reasons of material self-interest: “Jewish liberalism is more an institutional than an attitudinal phenomenon. It is associated more with Jews’ political linkages and involvements than with their underlying attitudes.” (p. 143)

Ginsberg attributes the rise of black anti-Semitism over the past couple decades to the desire of upwardly mobile blacks to share in the positions of power held by Jews in the welfare-state apparatus. Jews may oppose some black activities, but they cannot become too critical of blacks because it is the idea of helping disadvantaged blacks that provides the “legitimation of the American welfare state.” Indeed, Ginsberg maintains, “Many Jews and Jewish organizations believe that the fundamental interests of Jews are so closely tied, both politically and institutionally, to those of blacks, that it is sometimes necessary to support black demands even when, conceived narrowly or in the short term, these seem to be disadvantageous to Jews.” (p. 165) It is that vested interest in the liberal welfare state that prevented most Jews from turning to Republicanism in the 1980s despite the Republicans’ support for pro-Jewish positions on racial quotas and the defense of Israel.

Although the overwhelming majority of Jews did not turn to Reagan Republicanism in the 1980s, “Jews played important roles in implementing the administration’s economic and foreign policy objectives,” Ginsberg writes. “The association of Jews with Reaganism, especially in the realm of foreign policy, helped to heighten the anti-Semitism of forces on the political Left but produced a measure of philo-Semitism on the right, most notably among Protestant fundamentalists.” (p. 188) Neoconservative Reaganauts identified Israel as America’s “strategic asset” in the Cold War, and Israel actually helped the United States fight communism in Latin America and elsewhere. In the economic realm, Jewish parvenu financiers such as Michael Milken were the major beneficiaries of the Reagan rollback of regulations.

Ginsberg claims that the Republicans, unable to attract any significant number of Jews to their side, abandoned their support of the neocon elite with the end of the Cold War. Israel simply was no longer needed as an ally. Thus President Bush and Secretary of State James Baker tried to coerce Israel into following American Middle East policy and in so doing alienated their neoconservative support. Ginsberg, who completed Fatal Embrace at the beginning of the Clinton administration, emphasizes the large number of Jews who were entering that regime, reinforcing his theme of American Jewry’s continued identification with liberal Democrats.

The author attempts to gauge whether Jewish power — which aroused strong opposition in the past — is threatened today. Despite the explicit anti-Semitism of blacks, Ginsberg doubts that they pose a direct threat to Jews because of their dependence on the welfare state that Jews supervise: blacks and Jews are “locked into a long-term relationship which neither can easily abandon.” (p. 183) Black anti-Semitic rhetoric, however, has loosened the taboo against anti-Semitism in American society, according to Ginsberg, so that white right-wing forces — Joe Sobran, Patrick Buchanan, David Duke, paleoconservatives — can attack Jews and their agenda. Ginsberg believes that those right-wingers, if they should use the correct populist appeal to unite upper- and lower-class whites in what he characterizes as the Nazi manner, could pose a formidable threat to American Jewry: “An alliance of radical populists and respectable conservatives would almost inevitably make vigorous use of anti-Semitic themes to attack the liberal Democratic regime, and the Jews would find themselves locked in the fatal embrace of yet another state.” (p. 243)

***

Ginsberg is far more explicit on the reality of Jewish power than any other pro-Jewish author of which this reader is aware. However, he leaves some important matters unresolved.

First, it must be asked: What enables Jews to dominate societies? Ginsberg says they have certain talents — scholarly, business, managerial – not possessed by the bulk of the population. However, he does not claim (like Nathaniel Weyl) that Jews are innately more intelligent than other people. It is odd that societies supposedly based on equality (such as America’s current welfare state) would come to reflect greater Jewish dominance. With all the purported equal educational opportunities and aid to the disadvantaged, one would think that social and economic differences among groups would lessen over time. Of course, it could be argued that the real purpose of the liberal welfare state is not to help the disadvantaged but rather to keep them dependent in order to maintain the rationale for the welfare institutions that Jews dominate. Ginsberg does not even hint at this explanation.

Also problematic is the author’s understanding of anti-Semitism. Ginsberg characterizes as anti-Semitic those Gentiles who are critical of Jewish power and its uses. Therefore, anti-Semitism does not necessarily entail racial hatred, threats of racial expulsion or racial extermination, or even lies. A statement can be perfectly truthful and still qualify as anti-Semitic! Despite this apparent meaning, Ginsberg still gives anti-Semitism a negative connotation. Presumably, it is wrong for Gentiles to oppose the Jewish agenda. A reader of Ginsberg’s book should understand from the outset that the work is directed to Jews and Judeophiles, and that the author’s concern is the long-term effect of Jewish power on Jews. He does not dwell on the negative impacts that Jewish power has had on Gentiles, even though he cites examples in which Gentiles have been harmed — such as in the Soviet Union.

Finally, Ginsberg underplays the importance of neoconservatism. (Paul Gottfried, the foremost paleoconservative analyst of neoconservatism, has underscored the significant power of neoconservatism in such works as The Conservative Movement.) Bush and Baker did anger neocons, but neoconservatism still dominates the Republican Party and the American conservative establishment. Neoconservatism simply does not threaten the welfare-state apparatus that provides Jews a base of power. As paleoconservatives correctly point out, neoconservatism simply acts to coopt the conservative thrust of the electorate, rendering it harmless to those whose interests are served by the welfare state. Besides being innocuous to the domestic welfare state, a neocon Republican regime might better serve Jewish foreign policy interests than a liberal Democratic one. It could pursue a Zionist-oriented globalistic foreign policy without the inhibitions of the Democratic Left. And having neocons in strategic positions in the Republican Party means that the Jews have placed their eggs in more than one basket: no matter who controls the government, Democrat or Republican, Jewish power remains intact. Outside of the Jewish orbit there remain only Patrick Buchanan and the paleoconservatives, whom Ginsberg sees as imminent threats to Jewish power and its agenda.

Despite some questionable interpretations, The Fatal Embrace is of immense value for its candid discussion of Jewish power, especially since it is authored by a Jew who identifies closely with Jewish interests. It is must reading for anyone interested in this taboo but critically important subject.

Multiculturalism is Yiddish for ‘Divide and Rule’

Most people would agree that a family father who spends his money on other women instead of his wife and children, is a bad husband and father. What’s the difference with a politician who doesn’t first take care of the most basic needs of his own people, like jobs, health, education, affordable food, clothing and housing?

Why is it okay to worry about the preservation of the cultural heritage of native tribes in the Amazon or Australia’s outback, but not of Whites in Europe, the U.S. or the U.K.? At the current rate, they will become a minority in their own country within a generation or two. The only reason why the Jewish controlled media and politicians are so aggressively promoting multiculturalism is to make it easier for Jews to divide and rule.
Jewish Parasitism

As a parasitic tribe, Jews hate integrating in their host societies. They want to preserve their quaint eating habits, their ridiculous religious rules, their obsession with the male genital, their unethical business practices, their secretive ways, their supremacism towards all non-Jews. Doing so in a monocultural society for an extended period is impossible because of a sociological immune reaction called ‘anti-Semitism’. That’s why Jews – like spiders paralysing their victims for future consumption - have developed elaborate techniques to ferment their host societies, suck out all their wealth and then move on to the next host. Watch out, China, you are next! Multiculturalism, drugs, alcohol, porn, prostitution and sexual deviances are all essential Jewish tools on their destructive mission.
The Power of No

Maybe Ron Paul is the least evil amongst all U.S. presidential candidates, but he:

* he ignores the Israel lobby at a time when even uni professors and former presidents criticise its undue influence on U.S. policies,

* he supports Israel in every way bar U.S. tax payers money,

* he has shafted the 9/11 truth movement,

* he wants to return to the gold standard, effectively handing over control over the U.S. economy to the Rothschilds, and

* he wants to abolish the Federal Reserve, not nationalising it, allowing the Jewish banks to make more, not less money.

Voting for the ‘least evil’ is the reason why our self-chosen rulers have been getting away so far with this hoax of a democracy. While participation rates of 50% are low by international standards, they still provide U.S. elections with a legitimacy they don’t deserve. 5% or less would be the smack in the face our ruling elite desperately needs and the best way of calling her bluff.

How to spot a Jewish gatekeeper

Continues

NEW UK CITIZEN ‘EVERY FIVE MINUTES’

LINK

LINK

The Changing Face: Non-White Immigration into the White Heartlands

The Jewish Led Alien Invasion - Jewish Motivation Behind Immigration

Murdered by UK immigrant Mahmud Maksoudian

———————————————–

‘We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain destroyers forever. Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will forever destroy because we need a world of our own.’

Jews And Their Zionist Views

A Vast Social Experiment: The Immigration Act of 1965

Jews Created the 1965 Immigration Act

Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy, 1881-1965: A Historical Review — Here or Here

I wanna be the next Jew-stooge George!

McCain to AIPAC:
I’ll send every last Goy to the Middle East to fight and die for you.

Zio-Jews Can’t Legally Hire McCain To Be their Next Stooge!

“No person except a natural born citizen shall be eligible to the office of President”

John McCain was born August 29, 1936 in Panama

Zionist 100 year war plan

The Jewish neocon Michael Ledeen, in his recent book, The War Against The Terror Masters, goes right for the jugular. He shows not hesitation in manifesting the venom of his Jewish arrogance and the Jewish neocon agenda to create a Jewish New World Order:

—- “First and foremost, we must bring down the terror regimes, beginning with the Big Three: Iran, Iraq, and Syria. We will remain engaged. We have to ensure the fulfillment of the democratic revolution. We do not want stability in Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and even Saudi Arabia; we want things to change. The real issue is not whether, but how to destabilize.

Creative destruction is our middle name both within our own society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law. Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace. We must destroy them to advance our historic mission.”

Link & Video Here

The first chapter, “The Planes of 9-11,” explains that the Israeli military has a history of owning and operating private aircraft leasing and maintenance companies in the United States.

These privately-held aviation companies, created by the Israeli military and linked to its state-owned aviation industry, clearly had the capability and advanced avionics required to convert Boeing aircraft into remote-controlled guided missiles like those that apparently struck the World Trade Center (WTC) on 9-11.

Because the Israeli military had the capability to carry out the attacks, the evidence of Israeli prior knowledge raises a fundamental question that must be asked: Would the Israeli military conduct such an outrageous act of terror?

Millions of Americans have blindly accepted, without any proof, the government and controlled media’s tale that 19 Arabs, who lacked basic piloting skills, were responsible for the coordinated precision aerial attacks and subsequent carnage and destruction of 9-11.

On the other hand, the same government and media have shown absolutely no interest in probing the evidence or looking into the many unanswered questions surrounding the attacks.

There can only be one logical explanation for the persistent avoidance of the evidence by the institutions that should be leading the investigation. It is obviously because the evidence does not fit or contradicts the fictitious tale they have presented to the public.

The number of people who realize that the government and media have lied about 9-11 is large and growing. The pack of lies surrounding the attacks has been thoroughly exposed and can no longer be defended.

Unable to defend their fictional tale against the evidence presented by honest scientists and writers, the defenders of the lie use disinformation, defamation, and slander to try and contain the truth from spreading like wildfire.

ISRAELI PRIOR KNOWLEDGE

Bush’s last throw against Iran - By M K Bhadrakumar – Asia Times January 10, 2008

Playing around with the Persians can be risky - especially when the endgame nears. US President George W Bush is learning this civilizational truth. He could have learned from the Jimmy Carter administration.

The similarity is striking. A beleaguered White House increasingly looks irrelevant while the alienated country keenly searches for an idea of leadership that can offer a clean break with the past. That was also how the Carter administration looked 30 years ago.

What can a superpower do if someone “threatens” it? The Pentagon warned on Monday that five small Iranian speedboats “threatened” a powerful US fleet comprising one frigate, a destroyer and a cruiser in the Strait of Hormuz by coming within 500 meters of them. It warned of “provocative actions that could lead to a dangerous incident in the future”. Tehran calmly shrugged it off, “That is something normal that takes place every now and then for each party, and it is settled after identification of the two parties.”

Surely, the US can attack Iran in retribution. That is always the prerogative of a superpower in a unipolar world. That will also be fully in accord with the Bush administration’s doctrine of pre-emptive war. The influential Israeli lobby in Washington would even ensure a bipartisan consensus, despite the divisiveness and acrimony in US politics in an election year.

Russian missiles for Iran

But there is a rider. A war against Iran may not be an option for long. Moscow has begun hinting that Russia’s S-300 missiles are being dispatched to Iran. There is much constructive ambiguity over the subject in both Moscow and Tehran, which leaves Washington nervous and guessing. The medium-range S-300 surface-to-air missiles, together with the short-range Tor-M1 systems supplied by Moscow to Tehran earlier, would help counter any attempt by the Bush administration to bully Iran. To quote the Russian daily Izvestiya, “Iran will be Moscow’s trump card in its drive against the third stage of US missile defenses in Poland and the Czech Republic.”

President Vladimir Putin’s “asymmetrical response” could drill a hole right through Bush’s Middle Eastern policy bucket. The Tor-M1 is equally effective against aircraft, cruise missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles, but it is a close-battle weapon, the last defense line that engages or eliminates targets that may get through the S-300s. That is to say, Tor-M1 plus S-300 would for the first time provide Iran a credible modern multi-echelon air defense system covering any key strategic facility.

What does it add up to? The Bush administration is beginning to grasp that it has no option but to negotiate with Iran. But a new danger is that negotiations with Iran, too, may soon become a non-option. Persians generally don’t talk with people who are inconsequential. Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said last week that at the moment, relations with the US are of “no benefit to the Iranian nation. The day such relations are of benefit, I will be the first one to approve of that.” He seems to be anticipating the post-Bush era.

US policy disintegrating

These geopolitical realities cannot be overlooked. Bush was due to set out from Washington on Wednesday on his Middle East tour - Israel, Palestine, Kuwait, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Saudi Arabia and Egypt - virtually with empty hands. The gamble looks desperate, even for a congenital gambler. Distrust of US regional policy in the Persian Gulf region has extended even to Kuwait, which hosts about 15,000 US troops and which served as the launch pad for the Iraq invasion in 2003. Bush has two objectives in his Middle East mission - weigh in on the faltering post-Annapolis Palestinian-Israeli peace process of last November and seek support for US concerns about Iran.

Continues

It’s common knowledge, he reveals, CIA, Mossad behind terror attacks

Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga, who revealed the existence of Operation Gladio, has told Italy’s oldest and most widely read newspaper that the 9-11 terrorist attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad, and that this was common knowledge among global intelligence agencies.

In what translates awkwardly into English, Cossiga told the newspaper Corriere della Sera:

“All the [intelligence services] of America and Europe…know well that the disastrous attack has been planned and realized from the Mossad, with the aid of the Zionist world in order to put under accusation the Arabic countries and in order to induce the western powers to take part … in Iraq [and] Afghanistan.”

Cossiga was elected president of the Italian Senate in July 1983 before winning a landslide election to become president of the country in 1985, and he remained until 1992.

Cossiga’s tendency to be outspoken upset the Italian political establishment, and he was forced to resign after revealing the existence of, and his part in setting up, Operation Gladio. This was a rogue intelligence network under NATO auspices that carried out bombings across Europe in the 1960s, 1970s and ’80s. Gladio’s specialty was to carry out what they termed “false flag” operations—terror attacks that were blamed on their domestic and geopolitical opposition.

In March 2001, Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra stated, in sworn testimony, “You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force … the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security.”

Cossiga first expressed his doubts about 9-11 in 2001, and is quoted by 9-11 researcherWebster Tarpley saying “The mastermind of the attack must have been a sophisticated mind, provided with ample means not only to recruit fanatic kamikazes, but also highly specialized personnel. “I add one thing: it could not be accomplished without infiltrations in the radar and flight security personnel.”

Coming from a widely respected former head of state, Cossiga’s assertion that the 9-11 attacks were an inside job and that this is common knowledge among global intelligence agencies is illuminating. It is one more eye-opening confirmation that has not been mentioned by America’s propaganda machine in print or on TV. Nevertheless, because of his experience and status in the world, Cossiga cannot be discounted as a crackpot.

Investigative reporter Daniel Estulin has gone further with his bombshell revelation first voiced last week that political insiders are considering a plot to assassinate Ron Paul, today identifying the Neo-Con camp as being behind the potential hit.

Appearing on The Alex Jones Show, Estulin said that his sources for the information were real patriots who love America and are desperate to see the truth get out, but that he always took the precaution of getting verification from more than one individual on each piece of information he releases.

“What I said about Ron Paul last week came from two different people who don’t know each other,” said Estulin, adding that his source had in turn got the information from sources within the Neo-Con camp and that it was individuals from within the Neo-Con camp that are considering what would happen if Ron Paul was assassinated.

(Article continues below)

Estulin stressed that to elaborate any further he would need to seek permission from those giving him the information to retain their confidence and trust.

“I am getting information from my sources that there are people involved from a higher level of the American establishment who are seriously considering - this has not been confirmed - but assassination is definitely on the agenda and I pray to God that this is not the case,” Estulin first told Jones last week.

As we reported following the initial release of the information, Estulin described the concept as a “trial balloon from the inner core within the inner core - it hasn’t gone beyond that but it is obviously on the table because I think needless to say they are very much concerned,” he added.

Ron Paul himself has stated on a previous occasion that he is aware of the dangers of being such a bold icon for freedom and understands that political assassinations have occurred in the past.

In a June appearance on The Alex Jones Show, Congressman Paul acknowledged that such a threat is “real,” agreeing with a number of historical examples where leaders were killed or attacked for successfully standing up to the system. “That’s right. They’ll do it,” Paul said, making reference with Alex Jones to upstarts like Andrew Jackson, “The Kingfish” Huey Long, Bobby Kennedy, George Washington and even George Wallace.

Another secret service source told Estulin that the message scrolled across the bottom of the screen during Ron Paul’s CNN interview on Tuesday, “Paul is dead, Paul is dead, Paul is dead,” was potentially more than just a matter of quoting a joke made by Mike Huckabee about attacks on his campaign ads, but in fact could be taken as a threat or even a cue to Paul’s would-be assassin.

Estulin noted that a similar thing occurred before the assassination of Robert Kennedy in 1968, but was quick to caution that he could not confirm the authenticity of the judgment that this was related to the consideration of a plot to kill the Congressman.

Click here to listen to the MP3 interview with Estulin.

FLASHBACK: Estulin: Elitists Consider Assassinating Ron Paul

After an IED attack killed five members of 2nd Platoon Charlie 1-26 in northeast Baghdad, members of the unit gathered and determined that they could no longer function professionally. Several soldiers feared that their anger and want for revenge would result in a massacre of innocent civilians, and thus decided to stage a revolt against the orders of their commanders.

Charlie 1-26 was the hardest hit unit in Iraq so far, losing 14 soldiers in 12 months. Kelly Kennedy of the Army Times, who was embedded with Charlie Company, recalled the hostility the unit had towards Iraqis living under US occupation:

When the IED, the roadside bomb, went off, it was so close to one of the Iraqi police stations that they should have been able to see somebody burying that. It was right in front of somebody’s house, and nobody said anything. Nobody said to these guys, “Listen, there’s a bomb here. We’re worried about you,” even though they had been going out and patrolling and doing what they were supposed to be doing, in their minds. So when that IED went off and killed their five friends, they’re in–you have to understand, they’ve been living together for a year like brothers in the basement of this old palace. And it’s–they’re right on top of each other and going out and taking care of each other on the battlefield, daily firefights. And so, they’re closer probably than anyone could be. And when they lost their five men, they–I think they gave up on the Iraqi people.

If the Iraqi people weren’t willing to fight for them, then what was the point? And they were so angry. They just wanted to go out and take out the whole city. They didn’t understand why they couldn’t finish up what they call the war, and the whole idea of counterinsurgency is that you’re supposed to be building relationships, but they’re trying to build relationships with people who obviously aren’t that concerned about them. So this idea of a massacre was just–they were just so angry, they could barely contain it anymore.

More Here

Direct Links: Audio Archive - Main Site

Audio Archives of Father Charles Coughlin

In the late 1930s Coughlin moved sharply to the right and accused Franklin D. Roosevelt(who he once strongly supported) of “leaning toward international socialism or sovietism.” He also praised the actions of Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini in the fight against communism in Europe. On 20th November 1938, Coughlin defended the activities of the National Socialist Government as a necessary defence against the Soviet Union.

Like Joseph Goebbels, Coughlin realized that Marxist atheism in Europe was a Jewish plot. Coughlin also fought against the influence of Jews in America and this resulted in him being described as a fascist. In April 1941, Coughlin endorsed the America First Committee. In an attempt to silence him the government started the idea of licensing for radio .(Sound familiar?)

JEWS SUPPORT COMMUNISM (11/12/38)

NAZISM IS A DEFENSE MECHANISM TO COMMUNISM (11/20/38)
This show is incredible in that how far he went to explain why National Socialism had arisen in Germany…Unfortunately, we don’t have the show that preceded this one that caused the JEWS to get in an uproar against this brave man of the cloth.

PROPAGANDA AT WORK (7/5/39)

FEDERAL RESERVE/BONDS (4/7/40)
Father Coughlin explores the scam of the Federal Reserve

It pleases me very much to be able to present this to my listeners free of charge. Will be updating it because I have lots more…This is by no means an exhaustive archive.

BACK TO MAIN SITE

Stalin’s Jews

We mustn’t forget that some of greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish

Here’s a particularly forlorn historical date: Almost 90 years ago, between the 19th and 20th of December 1917, in the midst of the Bolshevik revolution and civil war, Lenin signed a decree calling for the establishment of The All-Russian Extraordinary Commission for Combating Counter-Revolution and Sabotage, also known as Cheka.

Within a short period of time, Cheka became the largest and cruelest state security organization. Its organizational structure was changed every few years, as were its names: From Cheka to GPU, later to NKVD, and later to KGB.

We cannot know with certainty the number of deaths Cheka was responsible for in its various manifestations, but the number is surely at least 20 million, including victims of the forced collectivization, the hunger, large purges, expulsions, banishments, executions, and mass death at Gulags.

Whole population strata were eliminated: Independent farmers, ethnic minorities, members of the bourgeoisie, senior officers, intellectuals, artists, labor movement activists, “opposition members” who were defined completely randomly, and countless members of the Communist party itself.

In his new, highly praised book “The War of the World, “Historian Niall Ferguson writes that no revolution in the history of mankind devoured its children with the same unrestrained appetite as did the Soviet revolution. In his book on the Stalinist purges, Tel Aviv University’s Dr. Igal Halfin writes that Stalinist violence was unique in that it was directed internally.

Lenin, Stalin, and their successors could not have carried out their deeds without wide-scale cooperation of disciplined “terror officials,” cruel interrogators, snitches, executioners, guards, judges, perverts, and many bleeding hearts who were members of the progressive Western Left and were deceived by the Soviet regime of horror and even provided it with a kosher certificate.

Continues

JEW-AMERICAN GOVERNMENT PLAN TO ERADICATE WHITES IN NORTH AMERICA

Click on this link for a Jew-Google Map showing the route of the “High Priority Corridor” number 18, “Route 69,” from Sarnia, Ontario to Mexico at the Port of Brownsville, Texas, as described in the US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration’s NHS High Priority Corridors Description planning document.All of the earlier mention of the NAFTA superhighway claimed it went through Kansas City.

OMG! We’re too late! These roads have already been built!

The one through Kansas City is “High Priority Corridor #23″ in the linked DOT-FHWA document:

The Interstate Route 35 Corridor from Laredo, Texas, through Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, to Wichita, Kansas, to Kansas City, Kansas/ Missouri, to Des Moines, Iowa, to Minneapolis, Minnesota, to Duluth, Minnesota, including I-29 between Kansas City and the Canadian border and the connection from Wichita, Kansas, to Sioux City, Iowa, which includes I-135 from Wichita, Kansas to Salina, Kansas, United States Route 81 from Salina, Kansas, to Norfolk, Nebraska, Nebraska State Route 35 from Norfolk, Nebraska, to South Sioux City, Nebraska, and the connection to I-29 in Sioux City, Iowa.

There’s also the “CANAMEX Corridor,” number 26:

• The CANAMEX Corridor from Nogales, Arizona, through Las Vegas, Nevada, to Salt Lake City, Utah, to Idaho Falls, Idaho, to Montana, to the Canadian Border as follows:
  1. In the State of Arizona, the CANAMEX Corridor shall generally follow–
     1. I-19 from Nogales to Tucson;
     2. I-10 from Tucson to Phoenix; and
     3. United States Route 93 in the vicinity of Phoenix to the Nevada Border.
  2. In the State of Nevada, the CANAMEX Corridor shall follow-
     1. United States Route 93 from the Arizona Border to Las Vegas; and
     2. I-15 from Las Vegas to the Utah Border.
  3. From the Utah Border through Montana to the Canadian Border, the CANAMEX Corridor shall follow I-15.

  I guess I should add them to the map.

Don’t confuse Ron Paul with the socialist George Bush and his plans for the SPP.

There is no freeway from McAllen to Corpus Christy. You have to travel almost 300 miles north from the border before you travel a freeway. Interstate 83 runs east and west. It is 8 lane in most places.

The highways need an upgrade from the taxpayer not foreign corporations. The nice thing about traveling Texas 2 lane highways is that people pull over onto the shoulder of the road and let people pass. No other state is like this.

For a more comprehensive discussion of the undoing of the U.S. and the move toward the North American Union, see:
http://www.augustreview.com/

It’s very interesting. I guess the thing I don’t understand is how they intend to manage to maintain order. As we’re seeing in Britain and now France, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to maintain a civil society devoid of any common values or sense of belonging to anything.

I looked at your link and it doesn’t show the High Priority map.

Click here for the enlargable map.

Also keep in mind that this past Sept, US DOT designated a shorter list of Corridors of the Future.

The North Shore of Lake Superior is more or less a dead end. There isn’t much of anything in Canada above it. The biggest road north from Duluth is Hwy 61 along the coast of the Lake. It’s a narrow, winding two-laner. Nobody would pick it for heavy traffic if there was an alternative.

The core of Canada is the interlake region of Ontario. That’s where most of the people and industry are. Few people will ship anything from Toronto to Guadalajara by going through Duluth.

So is that the reason for the demolition of the I-35W bridge in Minnesota? It must not have been big enough for transport.

Iran said Tuesday it has manufactured a new missile with a range of 2,000 kilometers (1,200 miles) capable of reaching Israel and U.S. bases in the Mideast, the official news agency IRNA reported.

Iran’s Defense Minister Gen. Mostafa Mohammad Najjar said the Ashoura missile was produced by factories affiliated with the ministry, according to IRNA. He did not say whether Iran has test fired the missile or has plans to do so.

Ashoura means “the tenth day” in Farsi, a sacred reference among Shiite Muslims to the martyrdom of the third imam.

Analysts believe much of Iran’s military production has benefited from assistance from Russia, China and other countries, but many of their weapons development claims have not been independently verified.

Iran launched an arms development program during its war with Iraq to compensate for a U.S. weapons embargo. Since 1992, Iran has reportedly produced its own jets, torpedoes, radar-avoiding missiles, tanks and armored personnel carriers.

Recent weapons development has been motivated by Iran’s standoff with the U.S. over its controversial nuclear program, which Washington claims is a cover for weapons development — a charge Tehran denies.

Iran is known to possess a medium-range ballistic missile known as the Shahab-3, which means “shooting star” in Farsi, with a range of at least 1,300 kilometers (800 miles). In 2005, Iranian officials said they had improved the range of the Shahab-3 to 2,000 kilometers (1,200 miles), equal to the new missile announced Tuesday.

Najjar did not elaborate about the differences between the Ashoura missile and the Shahab-3 missile.

In September during a military parade, Iran introduced the Ghadr missile, which has a range of 1,800 kilometers (1,119 miles).

Experts also believe Iran is developing the Shahab-4 missile, thought to have a range between 2,000 and 3,000 kilometers (1,200-1,900 miles), that would enable it to hit much of Europe.

From DEBKA-Net-Weekly Updated by DEBKAfile’s Exclusive Sources

Iranian mini-submarine for Persian Gulf targets

DEBKAfile’s military sources report the Iranian Navy is in the process of deploying two submarine fleets – mini-subs in Persian Gulf waters for attacks on US shipping and Gulf oil facilities, and the long-range Kilo class sub of Russian, Chinese and home manufacture, for long-range targets in the Mediterranean, such as the US Sixth Fleet and Israel coastal towns, primarily Tel Aviv.

Iran’s defense minister Mostafa Najiar announced Tuesday, Nov. 27, that a new Iranian-built submarine would be delivered to the navy Wednesday. He offered no details of the new item. However, two days earlier, Iran’s navy chief. Adm. Habibollah Sayyari disclosed that the new submarine would operate in Persian Gulf waters in the Strait of Hormuz area. He also declared that Tehran has no intention of blocking the Strait in a flare-up with the US military.

DEBKAfile’s military sources note that Iran’s strategic thinking has undergone a change. Hitherto, the rulers of Tehran viewed the blockage of the narrow waterway to shipping that carries one-third of the world’s oil needs, as its most effective reprisal for a military attack. They have revised their thinking for two reasons: First, Iran has made great strides in expanding its influence in Gulf oil states and an assault on their sole source of revenue would win more enemies than friends.

Second, as DEBKA-Net-Weekly 326 revealed Nov. 16, Tehran has developed a new capability to deploy in the Mediterranean Kilo class submarines armed with the Russian-made “Sizzler” Klub-S (3M54) missile. This missile can be shot from underwater at a range of 300 kilometers and has a powerful 450-kilogram warhead. It is launched from the submarine’s 533mm (21 inch) torpedo tubes.

This possibility was outlined by an authoritative Iranian security figure, the spokesman-cum-commentator at Iran’s defense ministry, Gen. Reza Naghdi, on Nov. 12. He said that if Iran were attacked, its navy – and its submarine fleet in particular – could come close enough to “reach an Israeli coastal target” from the sea.

Iran’s submarine fleet consists of 6 Kilo class craft, of which only three or four are serviceable. Another 12 submarines of the same class are on order from China, but there is no information that any of them has entered service or even been delivered.

Western naval experts say that Iran will need to keep all of its three or four operational subs close at hand, in case of an American attack.

The Iranian navy has none to spare for other arenas, unless a strategic decision is taken in Tehran to send a sub or two to the Mediterranean to hit American or Israeli naval shipping or the Israeli coast, even at the expense of its Gulf resources.

The Revolutionary Guards Corps is known to have built a large fleet of mini-subs and special marine units equipped with fast boats for deployment in the Persian Gulf. They might partly free up the larger Kilo subs for this option.

It may be recalled that Iran’s first intervention in the Israel-Hizballah war in South Lebanon last year was by sea. On July 14, 2006, Iranian naval officers helped Hizballah shoot a shore-to-ship C-802 missile from a Lebanese army base, crippling the Israeli Hanit missile ship. The incident is still considered the most damaging suffered by Israel in that war.

A month later, Iran began experimenting with firing the Sizzler missiles from its Kilo-class submarines.

The Kilo class submarine’s displacement is up to 4,000 tons submerged. It is 74 meters long, has a maximum speed of up to 30 knots surfaced, diving depth of 300 meters and range of more than 12,100 km. The Kilo carries a crew of 52 sailors and, depending on the type, is armed with six to eight 533 mm torpedo tubes, 24 mines and air defense missiles. The Kilo submarines’ quiet engines enable them to appear and disappear like wraiths, winning them the name of Black Hole from the US Navy.

Iran’s newest mini-sub “The Joo Slapper”

The Power and Influence of Israel-Lobby Against American Interests - Unmasked

 

HOW RAPIDLY WILL ISRAEL DISINTEGRATE?

No one is openly talking of it, and certainly there is no discussion of it in the United States. The Jewish-owned and controlled American media and academic establishment would never countenance any intelligent discussion of it – for obvious reasons. Even in Israel itself, there is probably not much discussion of it, and this would probably be due to the fear that an open and free discussion would generate even more momentum – and panic.

Yet, there is a growing realization around the world – though not in the United States – that we are living in quite extraordinary times, that an upheaval of epic proportions is under way, or nearly under way. Israel is actually in the beginning stages of disintegration; the sinister ideology of Zionism is, after half a century, at last collapsing.

The recent news from Israel that 27 reservist pilots in the Israeli air force are refusing to carry out military operations against Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza does provide incontrovertible evidence of the increasing speed of Israel’s disintegration. Israel’s military commanders and political leaders are naturally reacting to the growing disaffection in the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) with predictable fury and defiance. They warn that they will deal harshly with these so-called “conscientious objectors in uniform.”

There seems to be a strange – and quite powerful – synergism developing between the Israeli government, the American government, and post-war Iraq. It would appear that the Jewish people have now understood that they will be compelled to establish full-blown dictatorship in three states – America, Israel, and even Iraq. They are beginning to understand that this will be their first requirement if they are to stave off the dangerous developments in the Middle East. Their power in all three is dissolving, and the only way they will be able to hold on to what they now have – and enjoy – is to use extreme measures, and extreme force.

American Jews have plunged the United States into a risky and expensive war in the heart of the Middle East, and of course they wage this military campaign not with young Jewish soldiers but with poor and lower-class American men. The Jews in America and Israel clearly wish to rule the world – at least this is the goal for which they are striving.

The goals of the war against Iraq – securing the oil fields and pipelines and moving towards the creation of a “Greater Israel from the Nile to the Euphrates” – have essentially been achieved. Yet, this achievement depends very much on the submission of the US military to Jewish power.

And, so far the senior officers of the US armed forces have allowed themselves to become instruments of Jewish megalomania and criminality. But, it does seem logical to assume that an awakening in the senior levels of the US military and a similar awakening of Israeli Jews to the folly of Zionism – the disintegration of Israel – just might establish some kind of relationship. Synergy is a fascinating phenomenon. Events in the United States, Israel, and Iraq may indeed develop and unfold together; and the synergy of the three – and their growing and their growing and deepening connections – may prove to be irresistible.

Why you have lost your home and your family–in a word– Jew

“America is coming apart, decomposing, and…the likelihood of her survival as one nation…is improbable — and impossible if America continues on her current course,” declares Pat Buchanan. “For we are on a path to national suicide.”

“America is in an existential crisis from which the nation may not survive.”

The U.S. Army is breaking and is too small to meet America’s global commitments.

The dollar has sunk to historic lows and is being abandoned by foreign governments.

U.S. manufacturing is being hollowed out.

The greatest invasion in history, from the Third World, is swamping the ethno-cultural core of the country, leading to Balkanization and the loss of the Southwest to Mexico.

The culture is collapsing and the nation is being deconstructed along the lines of race and class.

A fiscal crisis looms as the unfunded mandates of Social Security and Medicare remain unaddressed.

All these crises are hitting America at once — a perfect storm of crises.

Pax Americana, the era of U.S. global dominance, is over. A struggle for global hegemony has begun among the United States, China, a resurgent Russia and radical Islam

Bush’s invasion of Iraq was a product of hubris and of ideology, a secular religion of “democratism,” to which Bush was converted in the days following 9/11

Torn asunder by a culture war, America has now begun to break down along class, ethnic and racial lines.

The greatest threat to U.S. sovereignty and independence is the scheme of a global elite to erase America’s borders and merge the USA, Mexico and Canada into a North American Union.

Free trade is shipping jobs, factories and technology to China and plunging America into permanent dependency and unpayable debt. One of every six U.S. manufacturing jobs vanished under Bush

“Sovereign Wealth Funds,” controlled by foreign regimes and stuffed with trillions of dollars from U.S. trade deficits, are buying up strategic corporate assets vital to America’s security

As U.S. wages are stagnant, corporate CEOs are raking in rising pay and benefits 400 to 500 times that of their workers

The Third World invasion through Mexico is a graver threat to our survival as one nation than anything happening in Afghanistan or Iraq

* European-Americans, 89% of the nation when JFK took the oath, are now 66% and sinking. Before 2050, America is a Third World nation

By 2060, America will add 167 million people and 105 million immigrants will be here, triple the 37 million today.

Hispanics will be over 100 million in 2050 and concentrated in a Southwest most Mexicans believe belongs to them

Buchanan’s Recommendations:

A new foreign-defense policy that closes most of the 1000 bases overseas, reviews all alliances, and brings home U.S. troops

A purge of neoconservative ideology and the “Cakewalk” crowd” from national power.

To avert a second Cold War, the United States should “get out of Russia’s space and get out of Russia’s face,” and shut down all U.S. bases on the soil of the former Soviet Union

To reach a cold peace in the culture war, Buchanan urges a return to federalism and the overthrow of our judicial dictatorship by Congressionally mandated restrictions on the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.

To end the trade deficits and save the dollar, Buchanan urges a Hamiltonian solution: a 20% Border Equity Tax on imports, with the $500 billion raised to be used to end taxation on American producers

To prevent America becoming “a tangle of squabbling nationalities” Buchanan urges: No amnesty for the 12-20 million illegal aliens; a border fence from San Diego to Brownsville; Congressional declarations that children born to illegal aliens are not citizens and English is the language of the United States; and a “timeout” on all immigration.

Sorry - do not have a link - received via EM - does anyone have a direct link?

————————————————–

Edit: Rasp dropped these two link for the above report —- >

Drudge Report: NEW BUCHANAN BOOK DECLARES ‘END OF AMERICA’

National Ledger: Can Pat Buchanan’s New Book Boost Ron Paul?

The late Joe Vialls, (died 7-18-05) . . . his site archived here

______________________________________

Some of his works below

America’s motive for invading Iraq

Russia Ready to Vaporize The Jewish State with Sunburn

Bush Demands Iraqi Air Bases to Protect “Israeli” Oil

Israeli Jews “Do a Waco” on Birthplace of Jesus Christ

More at link

Vanity Fair’s `Top 100′ seems to confirm age-old `canards’ about `Jewish power’

By Michael Collins Piper

If you think that the United States is run by a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) elite, think again. The reality is very much otherwise, according to an old-line American magazine that did, indeed, once rank as a voice of the so-called “WASP” establishment.

Vanity Fair—the stylish monthly now owned by the billionaire Zionist Newhouse family—has just published its annual list of the 100 most powerful people in America, what Vanity Fair calls “the New Establishment.”

What this amazing list reveals is a reality that many will find hard to accept: America’s “New Establishment” is overwhelmingly dominated by Jewish figures or those who are on the payroll of or dependent upon Jewish families and financial interests that bankroll the powerful Israeli lobby in America. That conclusion—however “offensive” or “controversial” in the eyes of some people—is inescapable.

Based on Vanity Fair’s listing from the position of 1-100, persons known to be Jewish occupy 53% of the power positions. However, there are actually 106 names on the list (with two names listed side by side in five places) and with the additional names (four of the six being Jewish), there are 57 individuals known to be Jewish listed.

So depending upon how one calculates, either 53% (or 54% including all those listed) of the most powerful members of “the New Establishment”—as perceived by Vanity Fair—are Jewish.And it should be noted that Vanity Fair’s assessment of who constitutes “the New Establishment” is one that critics would be hard-pressed to dispute.

The fact that a Jewish-owned publication has published the names of these Jewish power brokers (without specifically citing their ethnic and religious heritage) is interesting, especially since Israel’s prestigious newspaper, The Jerusalem Post, on Oct. 11, 2007, heralded publication of the list, saying in a headline that “Jewish power dominates [at the] Vanity Fair [list]. The reporter for the Post, Nathan Burstein, noted:

It’s a list of “the world’s most powerful people,” 100 of the bankers and media moguls, publishers and image makers who shape the lives of billions. It’s an exclusive, insular club, one whose influence stretches around the globe but is concentrated strategically in the highest corridors of power. More than half its members, at least by one count, are Jewish.

It’s a list, in other words, that would have made earlier generations of Jews jump out of their skins, calling attention, as it does, to their disproportionate influence in finance and the media.

Making matters worse, in the eyes of many, would no doubt be the identity of the group behind the list—not a pack of fringe anti-Semites but one of the most mainstream, glamorous publications on the newsstands. The list would seem to conform to all the traditional stereotypes about areas of Jewish overrepresentation.

Although the “mainstream” media in the United States has failed to note the Jewish predominance on the list— which can correctly be called predominance, since Jewish people are said to be less than even 3% of the American population—the news about the list has been commented upon in American Jewish community publications.

Joseph Aaron, editor of The Chicago Jewish News said that his readers should “feel very, very good about” the news that their co-religionists are so powerful in America. In the Vanity Fair list, which is reproduced here and annotated with factual details regarding those names on the list, AFP has indicated the Jewish names in boldface, although it is possible that there are other Jewish names on the list, but there is no firm research available confirming it. Also, note, for example, that media baron Rupert Murdoch— who appears at number one on the list—is not included here as being Jewish, for the reason that reports that his mother was Jewish have never been fully confirmed, although it has long been an article of faith on the Internet—perhaps in error—that Murdoch is Jewish).

Whatever his ethnic antecedents, Murdoch has been a front-line supporter of Israel and the global Zionist cause—no surprise considering the fact that his primary financial backers in his rise to power were the powerful Rothschild, Bronfman and Oppenheimer families—all very definitely Jewish. (An account of the rise of Murdoch and his media intrigues appear in The Judas Goats.)

Since the release of the list, several Internet sources have alleged that several other names on the list (that are not indicated here as being Jewish) are Jewish; however, AFP’s research does not indicate that this is so. The bottom line is that the preponderance of the names are indisputably Jewish, whether the disputed names are or are not.

Also significant is that the roughly 45-50% of the names on the list that are not definitely known to be Jewish or that are clearly non-Jewish are the names of individuals who are directly beholden to Jewish families and financial interests for their own power and privilege. Rupert Murdoch is perhaps the most prominent among this group.

Secondly, in this realm, is Warren Buffett—listed at No. 6. Buffet is not Jewish, but he has long been in partnership with the Rothschild family and is a primary of the powerful Washington Post-Newsweek media combine.

Although the Post is best known as the fiefdom of the American-based Jewish Meyer-Graham family, the evidence indicates that primary behind-the-scenes investors behind the influential Post empire have always operated in the sphere of Rothschild-connected banking interests operating on American soil. The Meyer/ Grahams, themselves, are related to the powerful San Francisco-based billionaire Jewish heirs of the Levi Strauss clothing kingdom.

Seventeen of those listed are either actors, entertainers and television and news media personalities who—while now wealthy as a consequence of their fame—owe their fame (and wealth) to the patronage of the owners of the mass media which made these 17 figures household names: for example, individuals such as Fox News agitator Bill O’Reilly and Steven Colbert, among others.

Three listed—Pinault, listed at 29, and Gagosian and Pigosi—listed at 84 and 86—are figures in the art world, which is known to be dominated by Jewish interests.

Eight others, such as Bernard Arnault (listed at 8), Giorgio Armani (listed at 37), Miuccia Prada (at 44), Karl Lagerfeld (at 52), Martha Stewart (at 54), Oscar de la Renta (at 53) Diego Della Valle (at 63) and Donatella Versace (at 81) are figures in the fashion and perfume industries—both of which are totally dependent on garment manufacturing (dominated almost exclusively by Jewish families and financial interests) and on department store distribution and the advertising industry, both of which are likewise dominated by the same elements.

Two of those listed—Bill Clinton and his former vice president Al Gore—are only politicians—note the clarification “only”—both of whom were installed in their positions of power through the patronage of Zionist financial interests. For his own part, Gore’s daughter, Karenna, has married the great-great grandson of Jewish plutocrat Jacob Schiff, a satellite of the powerful Rothschild family. Informed students of history know that Schiff was instrumental in financing the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia.

Several others are officers of media giants dominated by Jewish financial interests, acting as well-paid “fronts” for the controllers behind the scenes. For example, Richard Parsons, an African-American, is listed at 18th place, but he is no more than a front man at Time-Warner.

And as those who know the history of Time-Warner are well aware, that media empire has been dominated since at least the late 1960s, of elements linked to the organized crime syndicate of Jewish gangster, Meyer Lansky (who worked closely with Israel’s Mossad) and to the Lansky-connected liquor empire of Sam Bronfman, longtime chief of the World Jewish Congress (WJC), and his son, Edgar Bronfman, who recently retired as head of the WJC.

It has been widely asserted that the idea that Jewish families and financial interests were very powerful was “an old wives’s tale,” a “ridiculous anti-Semitic canard with no basis in reality,” said to be the product of a “discredited czarist forgery.” However, the new Vanity Fair assessment suggests otherwise and seems to confirm the theme of this author’s work, The New Jerusalem, which had already documented in detail what Vanity Fair has now confirmed: “Zionist power in America.”

Click here to see the list

Russian President Vladimir Putin yesterday warned that Moscow would not remain indifferent to NATO’s “muscle-flexing” and said Russia’s nuclear forces would be ready for an adequate response to any aggressor.

Putin, speaking to top generals less than two weeks before December 2 parliamentary elections, said the NATO military alliance had built up its forces close to Russia’s borders.

“We see that military resources of certain states and members of the NATO alliance are being built up right by our borders and in contravention of previously reached agreements,” Putin said in remarks shown on state television.

“We cannot allow ourselves to remain indifferent to the obvious ‘muscle-flexing’,” Putin said.

He said strategic nuclear forces - which control Russia’s long-range nuclear missiles - should be ready “to deliver a swift and adequate response to any aggressor”.

NATO is viewed with great suspicion in Russia, where Kremlin officials say expansion eastwards into the Baltic states and Central Europe shows the alliance is being used by the United States to threaten Russian interests.

Putin said Russia’s suspension of the Conventional Forces in Europe Treaty, a key arms treaty limiting forces in Europe, was one way to counter NATO’s “muscle-flexing”.

“We are not going to fulfil anything unilaterally - our partners did not ratify the treaty and some did not even sign it,” Putin said, adding sarcastically: “It was a nice affair.”

Russian generals say the issue of flank limits, which restrict Moscow’s ability to deploy heavy armor on parts of its own territory, must be solved if Russia is to return to the treaty.

Russian proposals to set up a single missile defense system under joint control have not had an answer from the West, Putin said.

He praised the military potential of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), a regional grouping of Russia, China and four Central Asian states which held joint military exercises in August in Chebarkul in the Urals.

“The growing defense potential of the SCO was shown in practice at the Chebarkul range,” Putin said.

At the August exercises, Putin said security threats had forced Russia to resume regular airborne bomber patrols across the world, bringing back memories of the Cold War.

Putin has been keen to show off his close ties with the military, visiting a nuclear submarine, flying a bomber and calling for better wages for soldiers.

The International Jew
— The World’s Foremost Problem

By Henry Ford — founder of the Ford Motor Company, and the editors of THE DEARBORN INDEPENDENT.

Introduction by Gerald L. K. Smith  [originally included with the abridged edition]
Elizabeth Dilling  [extract from a text regarding the provenance of the "Protocols"]
The Wisdom of Henry Ford 

Western Safeguards Initiative

[en Français, auf Deutsch, en Español, in Italiano]

If racial diversity makes America stronger, then America must have been a weak country in 1955.

“Hitler was obliged to borrow at second hand the ideas of racism from a Frenchman, Count Gobineau….” — from essay “What Is National Socialism?” by Jewish* communist/mass-murderer Leon Trotsky, June, 1933.

“Racism has struck again in downtown BigEasternCity, as White racists hurled racist slurs at…” — Little Sally Anchorwoman, on the UVWXYZ-TV 6 O’Clock News, 2003.

The term “racism” is bogus propaganda invented by the Jewish communist Leon Trotsky to help weaken the White race. Judaism is racism. Jews invented racism long before Christianity existed, i.e., the Jews deciding that they are “God’s Chosen People.” Look at who uses the term “racist” almost daily: Jews and Marxists. Somehow they only use that term to refer to Whites, not to Blacks or Mexicans. Why? Because the terms “racism”/”racist” are phony and Jewish. Whites created the West, while Jews and other minorities simply live in it.

Above: the type of architecture that Blacks and Jews do not create

In the night of July 16-17, 1918, a squad of Bolshevik secret police murdered Russia’s last emperor, Tsar Nicholas II, along with his wife, Tsaritsa Alexandra, their 14-year-old son, Tsarevich Alexis, and their four daughters. They were cut down in a hail of gunfire in a half-cellar room of the Ipatiev house in Ekaterinburg, a city in the Ural mountain region, where they were being held prisoner. The daughters were finished off with bayonets. To prevent a cult for the dead Tsar, the bodies were carted away to the countryside and hastily buried in a secret grave. [Image: Tsar Nicholas, infant Olga, Tsaritsa Alexandra.]

Bolshevik authorities at first reported that the Romanov emperor had been shot after the discovery of a plot to liberate him. For some time the deaths of the Empress and the children were kept secret. Soviet historians claimed for many years that local Bolsheviks had acted on their own in carrying out the killings, and that Lenin, founder of the Soviet state, had nothing to do with the crime.

In 1990, Moscow playwright and historian Edvard Radzinsky announced the result of his detailed investigation into the murders. He unearthed the reminiscences of Lenin’s bodyguard, Alexei Akimov, who recounted how he personally delivered Lenin’s execution order to the telegraph office. The telegram was also signed by Soviet government chief Yakov Sverdlov. Akimov had saved the original telegraph tape as a record of the secret order.

Radzinsky’s research confirmed what earlier evidence had already indicated. Leon Trotsky — one of Lenin’s closest colleagues — had revealed years earlier that Lenin and Sverdlov had together made the decision to put the Tsar and his family to death. Recalling a conversation in 1918, Trotsky wrote: — > Continues

Synagogue of Satan

I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan. Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer . . . be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life. . . . Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee. Revelation 2:9-10, 3:9.

Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness. Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous, And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? Matthew 23:27-33.

Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me. Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word. Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not. Which of you convinceth me of sin? And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me? He that is of God heareth God’s words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God. John 8:39-47.

“Today the Jews rule this world by proxy. They get others to fight and die for them.” Prime Minister of Malaysia, Mahathir Mohamad, October 17, 2003.

Benjamin H. Freedman was an insider in the world Zionist conspiracy. He was a successful Jewish businessman of New York City who was at one time the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry in 1945, when by the grace of God he was saved and became a Christian. He spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune, exposing the Jewish conspiracy against the United States and the world. “Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our times.” In the following 1961 speech given at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C. on behalf of Conde McGinley’s patriotic newspaper of that time, Common Sense, Freedman revealed the plans the Zionist Jews have for World War III. Listen to him reveal in his own words reveal the Zionist conspiracy against the United States.

ZIONISTS Jews Really Destroyed The WTC Incendiary Flash U.S. CONTROLLED PRESS SILENT IN THE FACE OF ISRAELI WAR CRIMES Christopher Bollyn American Free Press As The Israeli Government Under Prime Minister Ehud Olmert Escalates And Widens Its Aggression Against The Palestinians And Lebanese, The U.S. Government And Controlled Media Are Silent In The Face Of Egregious Israeli War Crimes….

These mixed breed white niggers make me sick. WTF are they doing in our country? Why even have a GD country if any lowdown, criminally insane, half white-half nigger beast can just slither in? A country is a peoples is a race. A country is not made-up of niggers, Asiatic and mongrels of every breed. If any are confused, ask a Chinaman from China or a Japanese person from Japan, better yet, ask a White in Portugal or Spain - see what they tell you about these multi-cultural and multi-ethnical nations. They aren’t worth a bottle of cold piss and they die out sooner rather than later. Perhaps that’s what the designers of this evil is plotting? Just read in Daniel concerning the statue and why it fell. Each metal represented a nation, yet each nation (or dynasty) ultimately was felled. Why? Well, look at the last nation or dynasty, feet made of clay and iron, and in some area’s made of a mixture of both clay and iron. Two of the weakest materials known to man. That last nation or dynasty represents America, the nation that rose the fastest, the strongest and the nation prophesied to fall the fastest as well as the hardest. Many dynasties lasted thousands of years, America will be lucky to go another twenty-five before that iron and clay completely deteriorates. But that iron and clay and a mixture thereof, isn’t really iron and clay - it’s symbolic of an inter-racial and multi-cultural society, and as stated, those are the ones that fall apart sooner rather than later. And the designers of this evil, the satanic jew, more than realizes this. After-all, it was him that led the Arab and mixed-breed Moors during Moorish invasions that still to this day afflict Portugal, Spain and Italy.

BTW, I remember reading a story about how Albert Pujols, the cousin of this white kid killing thug was collecting food stamps when he first arrived in this country. Now he’s a million dollar baller. It makes me sick just to see all the White faces in the stands who support scum like this. I gave-up any and all sports when it became obvious what the jews who rule over it were doing. Slowly replacing the White faces with those of niggers and spiggers. I was already pissed for years because I would have rather watched a team with players from that state, like if they played in St. Louis, I wanted the best of Missouri’s players to be on the team. I didn’t want some cat from California playing in St. Louis. But that didn’t stop me from watching and being a part of the game. What stopped me from giving a crap about the game was when these bastards weren’t even from the country, much less the state.

These lowlife, nasty, dirty, filthy creatures from South America with their half-assed English repulse me. Me hitty home ruin, wite girl lubs me at bar. I heard Pedro Guerrero spew that after a game and after he hit a home run. It was on live TV so it couldn’t be edited out. The White interviewer was flabbergasted after the spic’s comment and shortened the interview because of it. But still, I saw enough and said FU to the St. Louis Redbirds who became the St. Louis Blackbirds. And I’ll say the same thing to any white trash pansy ass enablers of nigger/spigger sports - FU for supporting them.

And no the death of this young boy didn’t have anything to do with Albert Pujols or sports. But it does have everything to do with spics and the non-white invasion that continues unabated - both byproducts of Albert Pujols and sports. A small token of the products that equated to the death of this boy.

Look at this pathetic creature, earrings in his nose and sh*t, just as lowly as any beast of the field nigger mentioned in the book of Job. It should be legal to removed these creatures from our midst at any and all cost. The United States Government, consisting of the most perverse, satanic and evil bastards to ever live, are the real terrorists. These jewish led, greed filled warmongering satanists should be immediately replaced by a new regime, one that would refuse to fight in the Middle East for jewish benefit, and one who will allow our troops to fight the real battle, the one on our own soil! White men, women and even White children are being slaughtered EVERYDAY in the streets! WTF are our troops doing in Iraq and Afghanistan! THE GD BATTLE IS HERE!!!!!

Witnesses said the red Ford was speeding, going 90 mph or faster, when it hit the teenager on a bicycle Thursday night.

The police car was right behind.

Christopher E. Cooper, 17, a son, a smiling classmate, and a skateboarder, died of blunt trauma from the collision.

On Friday, prosecutors charged with murder the man they say was driving the speeding car.

Wilfredo J. Pujols, 24, faces one count of second-degree murder, one count of resisting arrest and two counts of leaving the scene of an accident and driving while intoxicated.

All but the DWI are felonies.

Pujols, of Independence, made his first appearance in court Friday evening. A judge read the charges against him and ordered him held on $500,000 cash bond.

Cooper’s death was the third in less than 10 days involving a driver trying to elude Independence police. In each of the first two, the fleeing drivers died after their cars lost control and overturned.

According to witnesses and police accounts, Cooper was trying to cross Noland Road at Osage Street about 9 p.m. Thursday, bound for home after stopping at a QuikTrip.

Witnesses said Cooper had waited for a turning vehicle to clear the intersection, then crossed as the red Ford sped around stopped traffic. The car’s headlights were off and it showed no attempt to slow down, witnesses told police.

An officer chasing the Ford saw a body in the street and reported that one of the occupants may have jumped out. Later, when he noticed two suspects still inside, he radioed dispatchers that a pedestrian may have been struck.

News of Cooper’s death hit classmates at Truman High School especially hard. Less than two hours after classes began Friday, a steady line of cars formed with parents waiting to pick up distraught children.

“He wasn’t just a good kid, he was a great kid,” freshman Katie Jones said to sophomore Lacey Hubbard later Friday afternoon at the crash site.

Classmates described Cooper as an avid skateboarder.

At Santa Fe Trail Park on Friday night, classmates, friends and family paid homage to

Cooper at a skateboard park her visited nearly every day.

“We love you Coop!” was scrawled on the pavement of the park, and a candlelight altar with photographs of him burned on a ledge.

Cooper’s older brother Ryan Steely led the vigil and spoke about how thankful the family was to see such an outpouring of support. He asked for a moment of silence, and simply spoke with quiet disbelief at the loss of their loved one.

“Everything is kind of overwhelming,” he said.

————————

Pujols Cousin Charged With Second-Degree Murder

A man accused of killing of a 17-year-old bicyclist while fleeing police in a car has been hit with numerous charges, including second-degree felony murder.

In addition to the murder charge, Jackson County prosecutor Jim Kanatzar on Friday charged Wilfredo J. Pujols Jr. with two counts of leaving the scene of an accident, resisting arrest and driving while intoxicated.

Pujols, the cousin of St. Louis Cardinals first baseman Albert Pujols, is the alleged driver of a vehicle that struck bicyclist Christopher Cooper during a chase that started on Interstate 70 around 8 p.m. Thursday night. Cooper was hit when the fleeing car ran a red light.

Pujols and another occupant fled into the woods after striking a tree, but were tracked down by police dogs and arrested.

Pujols was being held in the Jackson County Jail in lieu of $1 million bond.

SOLVING 9-11

Chapter 1

The Israeli Military Aircraft Company Tied to 9-11

By Christopher Bollyn
15 October 2007

A little-known and privately-held aircraft leasing company created by the Israeli military intelligence is connected to the Mossad-run airport security and passenger screening company at the center of the “false flag” terror network of 9-11.

SOLVING 9-11

I am not like those who claimed to be 9-11 researchers, but who now say they have “moved beyond 9/11.” How can anyone abandon the pursuit of the truth about 9-11 before the crime has been solved?

Six years after the terrorist attacks in which some 3,000 innocent people died, not one victim’s lawsuit has yet gone to trial. As a nation, Americans can not allow 9-11 to go unsolved.

How can we forget the hundreds of people who were roasted alive in the burning twin towers? How can we ignore the death and destruction that we, as a result, have wrongfully inflicted on the innocent people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, and Palestine?

Who can accept an unelected administration dragging our military from one illegal war to another in the utterly fraudulent “war on terror,” which they have promised will last for generations?

Vice-President Dick Cheney has said that the US must be prepared to fight the war on terror for decades.

If we, as Americans and citizens of the world, don’t demand the truth of 9-11, who and what do we really stand for? Everything this administration has done for the past 6 years has been based on an unproven interpretation of the events of 9-11.

What does it mean to be a citizen of “the land of the free and the home of the brave” if we allow our minds and our nation to be so easily hijacked by a pack of lies construed by a foreign power that terrorizes our citizens and extorts our government officials?

During the past few months, I have redoubled my efforts to solve 9-11. As the cover-up becomes more obvious and the guilty parties reveal themselves, this is the time to pile on the pressure, not give up.

ZIONIST ZEITGEIST

I cannot abide mass murder, occupation, and genocidal wars of aggression. Nor can I accept the corruption of our values and destruction of our basic American rights to suit an artificially imposed “war on terror.”

Guantanamo - An affront to American values and the civilized world.

With the passage of time, it is now clear that 9-11 was carried out in order to kick-start the perverse Zionist Zeitgeist called the “war on terror” with its pre-planned wars of aggression and occupation.

In December 2001, veteran German intelligence professionals told me that 9-11 had been executed by a state-sponsored criminal network and had required years of planning.

Eckehardt Werthebach, the former president of Germany’s domestic intelligence service, Verfassungsschutz, told me in 2001 that “the deathly precision” and “the magnitude of planning” of the 9-11 attacks would have required “years of planning.”

Such a sophisticated operation, Werthebach said, would require the “fixed frame” of a state intelligence organization, something not found in a “loose group” like the one allegedly led by Mohammed Atta while he studied in Hamburg.

If Werthebach’s analysis is correct, and I have every reason to believe it is, the official version is nothing but a pack of lies. This would mean that the members of the criminal network are still in the highest positions of power in the U.S., Israel, and other nations.

The members of this network are dedicated to preventing the evidence from being released because the evidence would expose the real perpetrators. This is the only logical reason why the 9-11 evidence has been confiscated, the investigation controlled, and the litigation and discovery processes obstructed.

At this point, it should be clear that 9-11 will never be solved by the federal government, the appointed investigators or law enforcement agencies, or the corrupt courts. These controlled agencies, like the Zionist-controlled media, are only interested in controlling the information and preventing the evidence from coming out.

This crime will only be solved by concerned and dedicated independent researchers.

THE ZIONIST STRATEGY

9-11 was a very sophisticated operation, as Werthebach said, which required the “fixed frame” of a state intelligence organization. It was carefully planned years in advance and carried out for one strategic purpose: to kick-start the Zionist-planned “war on terror.”

The rabid Neo-Con Zionists who have dominated the Bush administrations pushed the “war on terror” with its criminal wars of aggression, occupation, and Balkanization in the Middle East as the strategic response to 9-11. The Zionist media moguls, who dominate the U.S. mass media, have in turn pushed the “war on terror” into the public mind as the suitable and proper response to the attacks, which they have refused to investigate.

Some of the key Neo-Cons of the Bush administration

An Israeli official named Oded Yinon revealed the Zionist strategy to Balkanize the entire Middle East into ethnic mini-states in the early 1980s. The plan for a global “war on terror” to accomplish this goal has been articulated since the mid-1980s ad nauseam by Benjamin Netanyahu, the former Israeli prime minister of the extreme right-wing Likud party. The Israeli military’s plans to realize these strategic goals have obviously been in the works for at least three decades.

THE HOAX OF 9-11

9-11 is, in fact, a gigantic hoax on the world. Only by exposing the terrorist masterminds behind 9-11 will we reveal the criminals behind the fraudulent “war on terror” and epidemic of “false flag” terrorism that plagues the world.

False flag terrorism is a crime of terrorism designed by the architects to be blamed on their enemy. The media outlets, which the criminals control, facilitate the blame game by repeating the chorus from the script and stifling any independent investigation or analysis of the crime.

9-11, after all, remains an unsolved crime. It is, however, quite obvious who is responsible for blocking discovery and obstructing justice for the victims and their relatives. At every critical point where the events and circumstances of 9-11 should have been investigated and discussed, there has been a Zionist, a dedicated devotee of the State of Israel, occupying the key position and acting as the controller and censor of evidence - the gatekeeper of information.

I have seen this pattern in earlier cover-ups. The same pattern was used with the sinking of Estonia in the Baltic Sea (1994) and the U.S. government’s (NTSB) investigation of the downing of TWA Flight 800, two of the most egregious examples of government cover-ups in modern times.

NTSB Director of Aviation Safety Bernard Loeb summarized the TWA 800 investigation: “We cannot be certain that this, in fact, occurred, but of all the ignition scenarios we considered, this scenario is the most likely.”

In each case, the three critical phases of the cover-up: investigation and access to evidence, media interpretation of the event, and related litigation, were all tightly controlled to prevent any meaningful discovery of what had really caused the disaster.

The people who are preventing the discovery of the facts in such cases are actually complicit in covering-up crimes of mass murder.

Logically, there can be no reason for dedicated Zionists to obstruct the investigation of 9-11 other than to conceal the evidence of Israeli and Zionist involvement in the crimes.

The FBI, for example, under the command of the Israeli dual-national Michael Chertoff, is responsible for the confiscation of the crucial evidence from 9-11, evidence which has been withheld for more than 6 years. This evidence includes video tapes of the Pentagon attack and physical pieces from the different aircraft involved.

Michael Chertoff, Asst. Attorney General responsible for the non-investigation of 9-11, is now in charge of the Dept. of Homeland Security, where he continues to control access to the 9-11 evidence through the Soviet-style Sensitive Security Information (SSI) Program.

This evidence is critical to prove what happened and which aircraft were involved in the attacks - but the FBI has refused to release this evidence. Neither President George W. Bush nor the U.S. Congress has demanded that they do so.

The appointed federal judges Alvin K. Hellerstein and Michael B. Mukasey, and the former assistant attorney general Michael Chertoff, who now heads Homeland Security, have not worked for 6 years to hide the critical evidence and block discovery in order to protect fanatical Arab Muslims or conspiratorial Jesuits. The efforts of these dedicated Zionists have been exerted to protect Israel, the foreign state to which they are wholeheartedly devoted.

U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein controls all the 9-11 litigation and has effectively prevented discovery and blocked any of the cases from going to trial.

The 9-11 cover-up is now full-blown and their role in it obvious. The players who are involved in obstructing justice are known. At this point, patriotic Americans must not abandon the pursuit of the truth. For those who died on 9-11 and in its aftermath, for our nation and our posterity, we are obliged to find those who are responsible for the crimes and cover-up of 9-11.

THE EVIDENCE OF ISRAELI INVOLVEMENT

I have pursued the leads of Israeli involvement simply because the evidence indicates that the Israeli military and intelligence had prior knowledge of 9-11, which indicates involvement.

The five jubilant Israeli Mossad agents who were caught celebrating and filming themselves in front of the destruction of the World Trade Center and their subsequent public statements indicate that the Mossad had prior knowledge.

Three of the five Israeli agents appeared on Israeli television in November 2001 and admitted that their purpose had been to document the 9-11 attacks.

The text message warnings of the attacks sent over the Mossad-controlled Odigo instant messaging system several hours prior to the attacks are further evidence of Israeli prior knowledge.

Furthermore, the Israelis have a long history of committing “false flag” terror attacks, particularly against American targets. The Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in 1967 and the Israeli terrorist bombings of U.S. and British civilian targets in Egypt during the 1954 Lavon Affair are the first that come to mind.

The Israeli military intentionally attacked the USS Liberty in June 1967, killing 34 and wounding 171.

“The [Israeli] ground control station ordered the aircraft to attack and sink the target and ensure they left no survivors,” Steve Forslund, a former USAF intelligence analyst recently told the Chicago Tribune.

If the evidence indicated that Saudis, Pakistanis, or even Jesuits were behind the attacks, I would investigate them. The evidence, however, points to Israelis being involved - so I look there.

There has been no independent investigation of 9-11 done by the controlled media other than Carl Cameron’s now deeply buried four-part series on FOX News in December 2001. Think about this for a minute. The mass media in the land of the “free press” has not done any independent investigation about the crime of the century.

The evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11 is too obvious so senior editors in the controlled media don’t let their journalists even approach the subject. The journalists of the “free press” in the United States are, unfortunately, confined to the same “Auschwitz of the Mind” as the American public they write for. They know very well that to touch the subject of Israeli involvement in 9-11 would be like touching a live wire.

Likewise, when it comes to tracking the Israeli criminal network that has operated in the United States for decades, the U.S. media is simply a dog that won’t bark - or hunt.

The extent of Zionist control over the U.S. mass media, including the Internet, is astounding. The mass media has effectively prevented most Americans from understanding who is really behind the false flag terror attacks of 9-11, and, by extension, the illegal and genocidal wars in Afghanistan, Palestine, Lebanon, and Iraq.

Zionist Jews established their media empire in the United States in the early 1900s and have been able to control how Americans think for generations.

The controlled media has left Americans with an extremely distorted view of the Middle East, Zionism, and the history of the Zionist state, Israel.

ISRAEL - A TERRORIST STATE

Israel is a nation which was founded by terrorists, ruthless men with histories of committing genocidal crimes and false flag terror attacks. Israel was created in 1948 in Palestine on land that had been “ethnically cleansed” of its indigenous Christian and Muslim inhabitants.

Ariel Sharon, the former prime minister who is reportedly being kept in a controlled coma, is also a prime example of an Israeli terrorist. Sharon came to power in early 2001, about the same time as Bush, some eight months before 9-11.

Ariel Sharon, Israel’s prime minister in 2001, has a long history of committing large-scale terrorist crimes.

————————

Much more here

The Bush administration has moved a step closer to military conflict with Iran, imposing punitive measures on its Revolutionary Guard Corps and calling the al-Quds unit of the guards a terrorist organisation.

Vladimir Putin immediately called the new US sanctions the work of a ” madman with a razor blade in his hand”. The Russian President said: “Why worsen the situation by threatening sanctions and bring it to a dead end?”

The Guards’ chief, General Mohammad Ali Jafari, said: “Today, enemy has concentrated sharp point of its attacks on the Guards. As always, the corps is ready to defend the ideals of the revolution more than ever before.”

The sanctions are the toughest measures against Tehran since the siege of the US embassy 1979 under the presidency of Jimmy Carter. The US has never before in its history taken such measures against the armed forces of an independent government.

US Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, announced the new measures, saying they were meant “to confront the threatening behaviour of the Iranians”.

The US was forced to act alone, however, with Britain only offering rhetorical support for unilateral action outside the United Nations Security Council. A plan to have gradually tightening UN sanctions is foundering following opposition from Russia and China.

The European Union remains deeply divided on the way forward with Germany opposed to more sanctions at this stage. It has a huge economic stake in Iran with which it had exports worth $5.7bn (£2.8bn) last year.

There was sharp criticism in the US as well. The foreign affairs commentator Anthony Cordesman said: “The Bush Administration has already done immense damage to US credibility throughout the region and much of the world. The administration … is viewed as threatening to drag the Gulf into another war – this time with Iran, as failing to consult and explain, and as indifferent to the views of its friends and allies.”

The Bush administration is making its strongest bid yet to brand Iran as a rogue regime already on a war footing, and causing trouble in Iraq, Lebanon, Afghanistan as well as the Palestinian territories with a military-controlled bureaucracy that is spreading terrorism and acquiring weapons of mass destruction.

But critics say it is once again distorting the facts as it prepares US and international public opinion for military strikes on Iran, either by US forces or by Israel.

Continues Here

US Vice President Dick Cheney — the power behind the throne, the eminence grise, the man with the (very) occasional grandfatherly smile — is notorious for his propensity for secretiveness and behind-the-scenes manipulation. He’s capable of anything, say friends as well as enemies. Given this reputation, it’s no big surprise that Cheney has already asked for a backroom analysis of how a war with Iran might begin.

In the scenario concocted by Cheney’s strategists, Washington’s first step would be to convince Israel to fire missiles at Iran’s uranium enrichment plant in Natanz. Tehran would retaliate with its own strike, providing the US with an excuse to attack military targets and nuclear facilities in Iran.

This information was leaked by an official close to the vice president. Cheney himself hasn’t denied engaging in such war games. For years, in fact, he’s been open about his opinion that an attack on Iran, a member of US President George W. Bush’s “Axis of Evil,” is inevitable.

Given these not-too-secret designs, Democrats and Republicans alike have wondered what to make of the still mysterious Israeli bombing run in Syria on Sept. 6. Was it part of an existing war plan? A test run, perhaps? For days after the attack, one question dominated conversation at Washington receptions: How great is the risk of war, really?

Grandiose Plans, East and West

In the September strike, Israeli bombers were likely targeting a nuclear reactor under construction, parts of which are alleged to have come from North Korea. It is possible that key secretaries in the Bush cabinet even tried to stop Israel. To this day, the administration has neither confirmed nor commented on the attack.

Nevertheless, in Washington, Israel’s strike against Syria has revived the specter of war with Iran. For the neoconservatives it could represent a glimmer of hope that the grandiose dream of a democratic Middle East has not yet been buried in the ashes of Iraq. But for realists in the corridors of the State Department and the Pentagon, military action against Iran is a nightmare they have sought to avert by asking a simple question: “What then?”

The Israeli strike, or something like it, could easily mark the beginning of the “World War III,” which President Bush warned against last week. With his usual apocalyptic rhetoric, he said Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad could lead the region to a new world war if his nation builds a nuclear bomb.

Conditions do look ripe for disaster. Iran continues to acquire and develop the fundamental prerequisites for a nuclear weapon. The mullah regime receives support — at least moral support, if not technology — from a newly strengthened Russia, which these days reaches for every chance to provoke the United States. President Vladimir Putin’s own (self-described) “grandiose plan” to restore Russia’s armed forces includes a nuclear buildup. The war in Iraq continues to drag on without an end in sight or even an opportunity for US troops to withdraw in a way that doesn’t smack of retreat. In Afghanistan, NATO troops are struggling to prevent a return of the Taliban and al-Qaida terrorists. The Palestinian conflict could still reignite on any front.

In Washington, Bush has 15 months left in office. He may have few successes to show for himself, but he’s already thinking of his legacy. Bush says he wants diplomacy to settle the nuclear dispute with Tehran, and hopes international pressure will finally convince Ahmadinejad to come to his senses. Nevertheless, the way pressure has been building in Washington, preparations for war could be underway.

In late September, the US Senate voted to declare the 125,000-man Iranian Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization. High-ranking US generals have accused Iran of waging a “proxy war” against the United States through its support of Shiite militias in Iraq. And strategists at the Pentagon, apparently at Cheney’s request, have developed detailed plans for an attack against Tehran.

Continues here

German parties blast Bush remarks

German politicians slam the US President’s recent remarks on Iran, saying they illustrate the war-mongering policies of the White House.

“Such comments hinder the efforts aimed to find a diplomatic and peaceful solution for Iran’s nuclear activities,” said Ruprecht polenz, chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee in the lower house of Germany’s Parliament, in a reference to George W. Bush’s recent remarks.

Polenz, who is a member of the ruling Christian Democratic Union, added Thursday that the warmongering comments have been presented in response to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s trip to Iran.

Germany’s Social Democratic Party also issued a statement on Thursday, describing the US president’s remarks as ‘irresponsible’. A spokesperson for the Party also described US go-to-war rhetoric as detrimental to the measures taken to resolve the issue peacefully.

Another German political party, The Left, said, “By issuing such remarks, Bush seeks to gain more support to pursue his hawkish policies against Iran.”

In a press conference held on Wednesday, Bush said Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons would lead to World War III. He didn’t provide any evidence for his claims.

“I’ve told people that if you’re interested in avoiding World War III, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing the Iranians from gaining the means to make nuclear weapons,” he said.

Tehran insists that its nuclear program is solely aimed at peaceful purposes. The IAEA has declared that there is no evidence to prove Iran is developing nuclear weaponry.

Crazy Bush Bush ups go-to-war rhetoric on Iran.

The official website of Israeli parliament has been hacked, with profiles of several legislators being changed and assaulted by hackers.

The words “soon to be jailed” and “fraud” were added to the profiles of the Zionist prime minister Ehud Olmert and former finance minister Avraham Hirchson, according to Al-Quds Post.

The Knesset Guard filed a formal complaint with police after some Knesset members discovered the changes over the weekend and had the websites taken down.

Olmert, who was questioned twice by police a week ago, is facing three investigations over fraud, corruption and bribery.

For his part, Hirchson was charged on Tuesday for involving in the embezzlement of millions of shekels.

The corruption of officials at the helm of Israeli regime is not a new phenomenon and former prime minister Ariel Sharon was also accused of bribery

Iran: ‘We will rub their noses in the dirt’
Independent Online South Africa – October 20, 2007

Iran warned on Saturday it would fire off 11 000 rockets at enemy bases within the space of a minute if the United States launched military action against the Islamic republic.

“In the first minute of an invasion by the enemy, 11 000 rockets and cannons would be fired at enemy bases,” said a brigadier general in the elite Revolutionary Guards, Mahmoud Chaharbaghi.

“This volume and speed of firing would continue,” added Chaharbaghi, who is commander of artillery and missiles of the Guards’ ground forces, according to the semi-official Fars news agency.

The United States has never ruled out attacking Iran to end its defiance over the controversial Iranian nuclear programme, which the US alleges is aimed at making nuclear weapons but Iran insists is entirely peaceful.

Iran has for its part vowed never to initiate an attack but has also warned of a crushing response to any act of aggression against its soil.

“If a war breaks out in the future, it will not last long because we will rub their noses in the dirt,” said Chaharbaghi.

“Now the enemy should ask themselves how many of their people they are ready to have sacrificed for their stupidity in attacking Iran,” he said.

Iranian officials have repeatedly warned the military would target the bases of US forces operating in neighbouring Iraq and Afghanistan in the event of any attack and already has these sites under close surveillance.

Chaharbaghi said that the Guards would soon receive “rockets with a range of 250 kilometres (155 miles)” whereas the current range of its rockets is 150 kilometres (91 miles).

“We have identified our targets and with a close surveillance of targets, we can respond to the enemy’s stupidity immediately,” Chaharbaghi added.

He said that the Guards’ weapons were spread out throughout the country and so would not be affected by any isolated US strikes against military facilities.

The Guards are Iran’s elite ideological army and responsible for its most significant weapons such as the longer range Shahab-3 missile which has Israel and US bases in the Middle East within its range.

Voice of the White House October 18, 2007
TBR News.org – October 18, 2007

“There have been many deliberately leaked stories about an attack on Iran but this time, it looks like it will go ahead.

Why now?

Both Bush and Cheney see that they are losing control, both personally and ideologically. They see the feared Putin making friendly with Iran and warning us not to attack. They see China and Iran, both perceived by Bush and Cheney as our enemies, doing more and more business with Iraq. And yesterday, at a televised press conference, Bush was attacked by reporters on camera. The reporter for the once-supportive Washington Times said, right out in front of the cameras, that Bush was now viewed as trivial. Bush stammered, glared and then responded that he was not.

During this conference, he was very angry and spiteful towards the assembled press and tossed hints that if the Russians and Iranians didn’t knuckle under, World War III was certainly coming. Many have seen this PR fiasco so it is not a great revelation.

Back at the White House, the staff knows that Putin’s growing involvement in international politics, in addition to his control of huge amounts of badly needed oil and gas has Bush, Cheney and their NeoCon controllers in a real and very dangerous rage. Putin has, and is continuing, to bait Bush and the insecure Bush is now being treated with contempt, his approval ratings heading rapidly to single digits. And what will happen? From the pinnacle of earthly grandeur, Bush sees himself being relegated to oblivio , and worse, in public.

People like Bush are incapable of accepting error so they always must have someone to blame for their own failings. Putin is now the focus of this self-hating lust for revenge, not the relatively harmless president of Iran. When Bush speaks in public about World War III, it is becoming very well believed here that he meant just that and threw that line off as a warning.

What do they plan to do, Bush and crazy Cheney?

Right now, they are thinking about attacking Russia!

Another possibility would be to assassinate Putin and yet a third, is to join with a growingly terrified Israel and attack Iran.

Connections at the Pentagon have said the same thing recently. They went along with Bush’s bluffing and leaks of imminent attacks on Iran but now, they tell me, it looks as if Bush actually wants to attack Russia!

This is pure nut stuff, considering that Putin is far more of a man and far tougher than Bush and, not to forget, Russia has a formidable arsenal of atomic weaponry and the ability to deliver it when and where needed.

The revival of the Cold War, such a pet project of the crazy VP is not the fault of Putin or the Russians but solely the child of Cheney who has his emotional and historical roots in the long-gone Cold War. Given the contempt with which both of these miserable creatures are viewed by their own military planners, massive leaks are certainly going to be forthcoming and if it looks if this deadly duo is going ahead, the military leaders will simply either resign en masse or send troops to the White House and take both of them away in handcuffs to be put on trial.

Maybe Bush’s head will pop off when then hang him.

War is coming and a very nasty war it will be…unless these two are stopped once and for all.”