Expose Them All

Hundreds of Israeli occupation troops stormed a Palestinian orphanage and a boarding school in the southern West Bank City of Hebron early Thursday, looting large amounts of frozen food, dairy products, clothes, shoes, refrigerators and kitchen equipments, local officials and eyewitnesses said.

The looted material were to be used to feed and cloth as many as seven thousand orphan girls and boys, many of them attending boarding schools run by the Islamic Charitable Society.

According to neighbors, the looting operation started around midnight Wednesday when soldiers stormed the al-Harayek neighborhood in Hebron where the inventory department of the Islamic Charitable Society is located.

“They (Israeli soldiers) forced open the main gate and outer doors and then started loading everything on trucks they brought with them,” said Muhammed Awwad, an official at the Society’s Inventory Department.

“They looted millions of dollars worth of equipments and products, it is an organized robbery, except that it is carried out by the army of a state that claims to be civilized and democratic.”

Awwad said the soldiers seized hundreds of crates of frozen meet, numerous food containers as well as a huge amount of clothes, including Pajamas, underwear, sanitary material, toilet papers, shoes, sport equipment, blankets, mattresses, and handkerchiefs.

“They even looted female children underwear, They robbed us clean.”" Awwad said.

Read the rest here

—————-

‘IDF the most moral army in the world’

The creation of the Zionist State of Israel (on stolen Palestinian land), gave the world an excellent opportunity to examine the true nature of the Jews, and understand why so many Gentiles (around the globe) detest them.

Their arrogance, cruelty, virulent racism, and brutality (often captured on film by foreign correspondents), gives us a true picture of a nation without a conscience, without a soul, without morality, and without a God.

The arrogant Israeli Prime Minister, Menachem Begin, once stated the following: “The Jewish “Race” is the MASTER RACE. We are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our “race”, other races are beasts and animals; cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves.”

Menachem Begin merely uttered what all Zionists believe in their hearts.

The uncivilized, inhuman, and brutal treatment of the innocent, unarmed, Palestinian civilians (since 1948) is a clear manifestation of the Zionists’ evil and racist mentality.

According to the prevailing Jewish mindset, all the despicable Israeli acts listed below, comply with the requirements of the Jewish Law. In other words, they are “kosher”.

1-Stealing 80% of the Palestinians’ land is “kosher”.

2-Killing innocent, unarmed, Palestinian men, women, and children, is “kosher”.

3-Practicing Apartheid, and Genocide, in Palestine, is “kosher”.

4-Building an enormous dividing wall in Palestine, without the Palestinians’ permission, is “kosher”.

5-Behaving like tyrannical, racist, bullies, is “kosher”.

6-Demolishing thousands of Palestinian homes (often with the occupants still inside), is “kosher”.

7-Burning thousands of Palestinian homes, orchards and farms, is “kosher”.

8-Unlawfully confiscating Palestinian properties, machinery and animals, is “kosher”.

9-Raping, and murdering, Palestinian girls, is “kosher”

10-Massacres and Atrocities inflicted upon the innocent, unarmed, Palestinian civilians, are perfectly “kosher”.

11-Torturing approximately 125,000 Palestinian prisoners, for decades, is “kosher”.

12-Forcing 1.3 million Palestinians (at gunpoint) to abandon their homes, their farms and their ancestral homeland, is “kosher”.

13-Breaking the arms and legs of children for throwing stones at Israeli tanks, is “kosher”.

14-Poisoning the water wells of Palestinians, with arsenic, to make them leave their homes and villages, is “kosher”.

15-Ignoring dozens of United Nations Resolutions, since 1948, is “kosher”.

16-Assasinating politicians, and leaders of the Palestinian Authority, is “kosher”.

17-Terrorising Palestinian families, in the middle of the night, with “Gestapo style” raids, is “kosher”.

18-Treating the Palestinian civilians like sub-human creatures, is “kosher”.

19-Using American helicopters to destroy Palestinian cars, with all the passengers still inside, is “kosher”.

20-Deliberately harassing, and bullying, Palestinian civilians at countless “check points”, and “road blocks”, is “kosher”.

21-Desecrating Mosques and Muslim Holy Books, is “kosher”.

22-Crushing demonstrators to death, with bulldozers, is “kosher”.

23-Renaming dozens of stolen Palestinian towns and villages with Hebrew names, is “kosher”.

Behaving like demented, homicidal maniacs is perfectly normal for the Jews. It is the result of 4,000 years of inbreeding.

How can wicked, mentally deranged, immoral, murderers claim to be members of the Human Race?

How can a group of arrogant creatures (who belong to the same Semitic tribe as the Arabs), claim racial purity and racial superiority? Jews show their abysmal ignorance, and crass stupidity, when they accuse the Semite Arabs of “anti-Semitism”!

How can cruel, evil, thugs who relentlessly break God’s Ten Commandments claim to be “God’s Chosen People”?. I regard their preposterous claim as GRIEVOUS BLASPHEMY. I honestly think that they are Satan’s chosen lycanthropes.

Apathy is an unforgivable sin. Evil spreads like a cancer when good men (and good women), do nothing to stop it. On Judgement Day, we will be asked to justify our total lack of compassion and callous indifference to the pain, suffering, persecution, injustice, and the bullying of millions of innocent fellow humans. How will we plead?

“One of the dreams of Zionism was to be a bridge. Instead, we are creating exclusion between the East and the West. Instead of creating bridges; we are contributing to the conflict between East and West by our stupid desire to have more.”

Israeli novelist & playwright Abraham Yehoshua

“We should prepare to go over to the offensive. Our aim is to smash Lebanon, Trans-Jordan, and Syria. The weak point is Lebanon, for the Moslem regime is artificial and easy for us to undermine. We shall establish a Christian state there, and then we will smash the Arab Legion, eliminate Trans-Jordan; Syria will fall to us. We then bomb and move on and take Port Said, Alexandria and Sinai.”

Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion, May 1948

More

Benjamin Ginsberg’s The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State, which deals with the rise and fall of Jews in different societies, is an intellectual bombshell. A liberal American Jew who teaches political science at Johns Hopkins, Ginsberg makes observations about Jewish influence in government and society that would be deemed anti-Semitic if expressed by a Gentile. Ginsberg, however, does not criticize that Jewish power for being harmful to Gentiles; his only concern is the harm it can cause for Jews by provoking Gentiles to anti-Semitic actions.

Outlining Jewish power since the Middle Ages, Ginsberg notes that Jews helped kings expand and centralize their realms; in mediæval Spain, for example, Jews were closely tied to the monarchies, largely, but not solely, in the financial sphere. But they also took the lead in working for the revolutionary destruction of societies hostile to Jews; thus, Jews played key roles in European revolutions, liberal and Communist alike.

In the liberal revolutions and in the development of liberal states, Jews propagandized the public and financed liberal groups. In France, Jews helped establish the Third Republic in the 1870s; their influence loomed especially large in the republic’s anti-clerical campaigns. Jewish financial and media power also provided the underpinning for the Weimar Republic, whose depiction as the Judenrepublik by anti-Semites was not far from the mark. In late 19th-century Britain, the Jewish-dominated press championed imperialism, which benefited Jewish finance. And during the early stages of the Soviet regime, Jews were numerous in leadership positions, especially in the secret police and the propaganda agencies, which they dominated. In contrast to Judeophiles who claim that Jews observe a higher humanitarian ethos, Ginsberg acknowledges that Jewish Communists played a ruthless role in liquidating their opposition.

Ginsberg warns that as a result of their great power, Jews become a highly visible target for the enemies of the regime and often suffer group destruction with the regime’s demise. Thus in the late 15th century, Ferdinand and Isabella expelled the Jews from Spain, where they had occupied key positions under previous monarchs. In Germany, Hitler eliminated the Jews along with the Weimar Republic; what enabled Nazism to succeed was a coalescence of lower- and upper-class opposition to Jewish power. Where such a fusion of divergent classes does not take place, as in the French Third Republic, Jewish power survives despite a high degree of anti-Semitism.

The Jewish fall from power does not always require the demise of a friendly regime. Sometimes a previously hospitable regime will eliminate Jews when they are no longer necessary for the maintenance of power, as was the case in the Soviet Union when Stalin dispensed with Jews. Ginsberg’s fundamental theory is that the Jewish close relationship with the state is a “fatal embrace”: the achievement of great power, and the concomitant high visibility, invite group destruction as situations change.

***

Ginsberg devotes the greatest part of his book to the history of Jewish power in America. German Jews gained significant power in the United States after the Civil War, largely in the realm of finance. Jews financed the U.S. regime’s Civil War debt, the debts of the reconstructed Southern states, and the nascent industries. In essence, according to our author, Jews were a part of the new business and industrial class of the Gilded Age, and became “identified with the worst excesses of the nineteenth-century industrial order.” (p. 75) Jewish prominence induced an anti-Semitic opposition from Southern and Western agrarians (Populists), and from old-stock New England patricians. Reacting to that anti-Semitic criticism, the Gentile business class jettisoned its ties with the Jews and aligned itself with the patricians. Thus, the 1890s saw the emergence both of exclusive clubs that barred Jews and of anti-Jewish quotas in the Ivy League colleges. Having been thrust out of the business elite, Jews sought to alter the American economic system, Ginsberg writes. They identified with the Progressive reform movement and — on the part of the newly immigrating Eastern European Jews — with radical socialism. The Jewish role in the Progressive movement crested in the Wilson administration, with Louis Brandeis playing a major role in the creation of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Trade Commission. However, the Jewish rise was transitory, cut short by the anti-radical Red Scare in the aftermath of World War I, which destroyed radical and reform movements as well as (in Ginsberg’s view) an emerging welfare state.

It was with Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal that Jews gained long-term power in the United States, power that continues into the present. Jews served as Roosevelt’s idea men and staffed his New Deal agencies. They played a fundamental part in fashioning the centralized American welfare state — and Ginsberg asserts that they created it to serve their own interests. In contrast to American Protestants’ success in the private sector, Ginsberg writes that Jews “relied upon the state and the public economy to achieve positions of influence and status in American society.” (p. 103) That account contrasts, we should note, with Thomas Sowell’s portrayal of Jewish success via the free market.

Jews also played a significant role in getting the United States into World War II to destroy their Nazi nemesis. And they worked actively to undermine popular noninterventionist resistance to war. For example, the Anti-Defamation League “employed investigative agents who secretly penetrated isolationist and anti-Semitic organizations and collected potentially damaging or incriminating information” which it turned over to the FBI and other federal agencies. (p. 110) Ginsberg does not develop this point, but given the fact that the overwhelming majority of “isolationists” were not enemy agents and were simply exercising their constitutional right to oppose a policy, it is apparent that activist American Jews have been quite willing to crush the civil liberties of others in order to advance their own goals. Jews also played a critical part in turning the media toward a prowar stance. (That was quite an achievement, since the American mood in the 1930s was strongly antiwar and “isolationist.”) In Hollywood, Jewish film makers concentrated on producing anti-Nazi propaganda films to prepare the masses for a crusade against evil.

In the immediate postwar period, right-wing attacks on Communist subversion put Jews on the defensive. Since Jews had been numerous in the American Communist Party, to them the attacks reeked of anti-Semitism. But by joining forces with the also-imperiled WASP elite, Jews were able to destroy the threat by exercising their media power. They did not just succeed in downplaying the idea of Communist subversion; they were even able to change the issue from Communist subversion to the right-wing threat to American civil liberties. That was quite a striking ideological turnaround from the Jews’ total disregard of the civil liberties of pre-World War II “isolationists.” The Jewish success against the right-wing danger meant that by the late 1950s, “conservative anti-Communists who sought to maintain a modicum of respectability … carefully avoided the least hint of anti-Semitism.” (p. 125) Ginsberg cites William F. Buckley Jr. as an example.

In the 1960s, the Jews played key roles in the civil rights revolution and the concomitant Great Society programs. For Jews, Ginsberg points out, support for black civil rights was not only a “moral commitment” but also an “important political tactic” to weaken the white South and the ethnic machine politicians in the North, and, as a consequence, increase their own relative power within the Democratic coalition. Moreover, the advancement of the concept of “equality of opportunity” bolstered Jewish power throughout society. (pp. 125-26) Jews opposed the Vietnam War because it inhibited the expansion of those liberal Great Society programs in which their power resided.

By the end of the Great Society reforms, Jews, in Ginsberg’s view, had become the major force in American politics and government: “From the 1970s onward, Jews led or were influential in most, though not all, of the political reform, feminist, consumer rights, gay rights, environmentalist and other public interest groups and related foundations, study groups, and think tanks that came to dominate the Democratic party during the 1970s and continue to be the leading forces within that party today.” (p. 137) And Jews wield considerable power in the institutions of the American welfare state, holding as they do prominent positions in the “public or quasi-public economy of government agencies, helping professions, private foundations, think tanks, and universities.” (p. 140) Since Jewish power and wealth is either directly or indirectly tied to the national government, rather than to state and local governments or to the strictly private sector, Jews have a vested interest in its maintenance and expansion. In short, Ginsberg contends, Jews support the liberal welfare state for reasons of material self-interest: “Jewish liberalism is more an institutional than an attitudinal phenomenon. It is associated more with Jews’ political linkages and involvements than with their underlying attitudes.” (p. 143)

Ginsberg attributes the rise of black anti-Semitism over the past couple decades to the desire of upwardly mobile blacks to share in the positions of power held by Jews in the welfare-state apparatus. Jews may oppose some black activities, but they cannot become too critical of blacks because it is the idea of helping disadvantaged blacks that provides the “legitimation of the American welfare state.” Indeed, Ginsberg maintains, “Many Jews and Jewish organizations believe that the fundamental interests of Jews are so closely tied, both politically and institutionally, to those of blacks, that it is sometimes necessary to support black demands even when, conceived narrowly or in the short term, these seem to be disadvantageous to Jews.” (p. 165) It is that vested interest in the liberal welfare state that prevented most Jews from turning to Republicanism in the 1980s despite the Republicans’ support for pro-Jewish positions on racial quotas and the defense of Israel.

Although the overwhelming majority of Jews did not turn to Reagan Republicanism in the 1980s, “Jews played important roles in implementing the administration’s economic and foreign policy objectives,” Ginsberg writes. “The association of Jews with Reaganism, especially in the realm of foreign policy, helped to heighten the anti-Semitism of forces on the political Left but produced a measure of philo-Semitism on the right, most notably among Protestant fundamentalists.” (p. 188) Neoconservative Reaganauts identified Israel as America’s “strategic asset” in the Cold War, and Israel actually helped the United States fight communism in Latin America and elsewhere. In the economic realm, Jewish parvenu financiers such as Michael Milken were the major beneficiaries of the Reagan rollback of regulations.

Ginsberg claims that the Republicans, unable to attract any significant number of Jews to their side, abandoned their support of the neocon elite with the end of the Cold War. Israel simply was no longer needed as an ally. Thus President Bush and Secretary of State James Baker tried to coerce Israel into following American Middle East policy and in so doing alienated their neoconservative support. Ginsberg, who completed Fatal Embrace at the beginning of the Clinton administration, emphasizes the large number of Jews who were entering that regime, reinforcing his theme of American Jewry’s continued identification with liberal Democrats.

The author attempts to gauge whether Jewish power — which aroused strong opposition in the past — is threatened today. Despite the explicit anti-Semitism of blacks, Ginsberg doubts that they pose a direct threat to Jews because of their dependence on the welfare state that Jews supervise: blacks and Jews are “locked into a long-term relationship which neither can easily abandon.” (p. 183) Black anti-Semitic rhetoric, however, has loosened the taboo against anti-Semitism in American society, according to Ginsberg, so that white right-wing forces — Joe Sobran, Patrick Buchanan, David Duke, paleoconservatives — can attack Jews and their agenda. Ginsberg believes that those right-wingers, if they should use the correct populist appeal to unite upper- and lower-class whites in what he characterizes as the Nazi manner, could pose a formidable threat to American Jewry: “An alliance of radical populists and respectable conservatives would almost inevitably make vigorous use of anti-Semitic themes to attack the liberal Democratic regime, and the Jews would find themselves locked in the fatal embrace of yet another state.” (p. 243)

***

Ginsberg is far more explicit on the reality of Jewish power than any other pro-Jewish author of which this reader is aware. However, he leaves some important matters unresolved.

First, it must be asked: What enables Jews to dominate societies? Ginsberg says they have certain talents — scholarly, business, managerial – not possessed by the bulk of the population. However, he does not claim (like Nathaniel Weyl) that Jews are innately more intelligent than other people. It is odd that societies supposedly based on equality (such as America’s current welfare state) would come to reflect greater Jewish dominance. With all the purported equal educational opportunities and aid to the disadvantaged, one would think that social and economic differences among groups would lessen over time. Of course, it could be argued that the real purpose of the liberal welfare state is not to help the disadvantaged but rather to keep them dependent in order to maintain the rationale for the welfare institutions that Jews dominate. Ginsberg does not even hint at this explanation.

Also problematic is the author’s understanding of anti-Semitism. Ginsberg characterizes as anti-Semitic those Gentiles who are critical of Jewish power and its uses. Therefore, anti-Semitism does not necessarily entail racial hatred, threats of racial expulsion or racial extermination, or even lies. A statement can be perfectly truthful and still qualify as anti-Semitic! Despite this apparent meaning, Ginsberg still gives anti-Semitism a negative connotation. Presumably, it is wrong for Gentiles to oppose the Jewish agenda. A reader of Ginsberg’s book should understand from the outset that the work is directed to Jews and Judeophiles, and that the author’s concern is the long-term effect of Jewish power on Jews. He does not dwell on the negative impacts that Jewish power has had on Gentiles, even though he cites examples in which Gentiles have been harmed — such as in the Soviet Union.

Finally, Ginsberg underplays the importance of neoconservatism. (Paul Gottfried, the foremost paleoconservative analyst of neoconservatism, has underscored the significant power of neoconservatism in such works as The Conservative Movement.) Bush and Baker did anger neocons, but neoconservatism still dominates the Republican Party and the American conservative establishment. Neoconservatism simply does not threaten the welfare-state apparatus that provides Jews a base of power. As paleoconservatives correctly point out, neoconservatism simply acts to coopt the conservative thrust of the electorate, rendering it harmless to those whose interests are served by the welfare state. Besides being innocuous to the domestic welfare state, a neocon Republican regime might better serve Jewish foreign policy interests than a liberal Democratic one. It could pursue a Zionist-oriented globalistic foreign policy without the inhibitions of the Democratic Left. And having neocons in strategic positions in the Republican Party means that the Jews have placed their eggs in more than one basket: no matter who controls the government, Democrat or Republican, Jewish power remains intact. Outside of the Jewish orbit there remain only Patrick Buchanan and the paleoconservatives, whom Ginsberg sees as imminent threats to Jewish power and its agenda.

Despite some questionable interpretations, The Fatal Embrace is of immense value for its candid discussion of Jewish power, especially since it is authored by a Jew who identifies closely with Jewish interests. It is must reading for anyone interested in this taboo but critically important subject.

George Bush winks at indiscriminate killings, further tarring the reputation of the U.S. military.

By forcing repeat combat assignments to Iraq and Afghanistan — and by winking at torture and indiscriminate killings — George W. Bush is degrading the reputation of the U.S. military, turning enlisted soldiers and intelligence officers into murderers and sadists.

For instance, on Feb. 10 at Camp Liberty in Iraq, Army Ranger Sgt. Evan Vela was sentenced by a U.S. military court to 10 years in prison for executing an unarmed Iraqi detainee who — along with his son — had stumbled into a U.S. sniper position last year.

After letting the 17-year-old son go, Vela’s squad leader, Staff Sgt. Michael Hensley ordered Vela to use a 9-millimeter pistol to shoot the father, Genei Nesir Khudair al-Janabi, in the head, an order that Vela carried out. “It was murder, plain and simple,” military prosecutor, Major Charles Kuhfahl, told the court.

Janabi’s son, Mustafa, was allowed to make a statement, explaining how his father’s death had devastated the family and how one of his four younger brothers now avoids their home because he can’t stand the sight of his father’s empty room.

“Please don’t forget about us,” Mustafa told the court.

But Vela’s guilty verdict was a rare case of holding a U.S. soldier accountable in the killing or abusing of an Iraqi. Among the infrequent cases that have been brought, most end in acquittals or convictions only on minor charges.

Last November, for example, another military jury acquitted Hensley in the same murder of Janabi as well as in the killing of two other Iraqi men south of Baghdad in the early days of Bush’s troop “surge.” That jury ruled that Hensley was following the approved “rules of engagement,” though it did convict him of planting an AK-47 on one victim.

Some of Vela’s military comrades complained that it was unfair to single any of them out for punishment because these killings are so common in Iraq.

Vela’s former platoon commander, Sgt. First Class Steven Kipling, said that if all U.S. combat soldiers in Iraq were subjected to the same scrutiny applied to Vela, “we would have thousands” of cases. [NYT, Feb. 11, 2008]

Indeed, the evidence does suggest that the handful of homicide cases from Iraq and Afghanistan that reach military trial represent only a small fraction of the unprovoked killings of locals at the hands of U.S. soldiers.

Continues

NEW UK CITIZEN ‘EVERY FIVE MINUTES’

LINK

LINK

The Changing Face: Non-White Immigration into the White Heartlands

The Jewish Led Alien Invasion - Jewish Motivation Behind Immigration

Murdered by UK immigrant Mahmud Maksoudian

———————————————–

‘We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain destroyers forever. Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will forever destroy because we need a world of our own.’

Jews And Their Zionist Views

A Vast Social Experiment: The Immigration Act of 1965

Jews Created the 1965 Immigration Act

Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy, 1881-1965: A Historical Review — Here or Here

I wanna be the next Jew-stooge George!

McCain to AIPAC:
I’ll send every last Goy to the Middle East to fight and die for you.

Zio-Jews Can’t Legally Hire McCain To Be their Next Stooge!

“No person except a natural born citizen shall be eligible to the office of President”

John McCain was born August 29, 1936 in Panama

Zionist 100 year war plan

Jewish dominated media attempts to smear Ron Paul because of a donation by a person they labeled as a “White supremacist.“ Whenever you see or hear the word “White supremacist“ you know a measure of pure horse sh*t has been mixed in with the icing. Billions of dollars missing and looted from the wars in Iran and Afghanistan, over a trillion dollars given to “Israel” in the past several decades, billions of dollars owed in interest on the jewish federal reserve scam (which is a huge part of the so-called deficit that has indebted each and every American for their entire lives) and the list goes on and on - but yet they whine and cry about a $500 donation from Don Black, the “White supremacist” who operates the anti-jew site, Stormfront. “Anti-jew” meaning, the site tells the truth about jews. They didn’t make-up or lie about the jew - they didn’t have to, the jew makes the reporting easy for them by their deeds and actions. These character assassinations, lopsided reports and half-truths are exactly the reason why the media has lost revenues in previous years - people have started to see past the propaganda and see through the garbage non-reporting. This story is not even newsworthy, and yet they reported this from coast to coast and in all their Zionist run media operations . . . TV, newsprint and radio. The media don’t give a damn about an internet site operator, an operator who from time to time has to plead with his membership to donate a dollar or two in order just to keep the site functioning. And they sure as hell don’t give a damn about a measly $500 donation - they want to smear Ron Paul - simple as that.

Who Runs the Media? The Full Story

The Federal Reserve Fraud!

(It’s been a long time since I looked into the jewish Federal Reserve racket - I did a quick Google on it using the words: “the jewish federal reserve scam” - the above link was the top result - click here for more results).

billions looted by bush - but this isn’t newsworthy because Bush split the money with his jewish bosses.

American aid to Israel - over a trillion dollars, but why concentrate on this - Ron Paul received a $500 donation from a “supremacist.”

Economist tallies swelling cost of Israel to US - but yet the jewish dominated media wants to tally the swelling cost of donations to Ron Paul

U.S. Financial Aid To Israel: Figures, Facts, and Impact

What exactly is this “Stormfront” anyway? The Stormfront and it’s operator that the jewish dominated media is so worried about? Sheeeesh, it’s nothing more than a message forum! - Stormfront

=========================================

Ron Paul Keeps Donation From White Supremacist

Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul has received a $500 campaign donation from a white supremacist, and the Texas congressman doesn’t plan to return it, an aide said Wednesday.

Don Black, of West Palm Beach, recently made the donation, according to campaign filings. He runs a Web site called Stormfront with the motto, “White Pride World Wide.” The site welcomes postings to the “Stormfront White Nationalist Community.”

“Dr. Paul stands for freedom, peace, prosperity and inalienable rights. If someone with small ideologies happens to contribute money to Ron, thinking he can influence Ron in any way, he’s wasted his money,” Paul spokesman Jesse Benton said. “Ron is going to take the money and try to spread the message of freedom.

“And that’s $500 less that this guy has to do whatever it is that he does,” Benton added.

Black said he supports Paul’s stance on ending the war in Iraq, securing America’s borders and his opposition to amnesty for illegal immigrants.

“We know that he’s not a white nationalist. He says he isn’t and we believe him, but on the issues, there’s only one choice,” Black said Wednesday.

On his Web site, Black says he has been involved in “the White patriot movement for 30 years.”

The Web site LoneStarTimes first reported on the Black donation on Oct. 25.

Akon is facing criminal charges after a fan said she suffered a concussion when the hip-hop star tossed a teenager off the stage and onto her in the concert crowd.

Akon, 34, is scheduled to appear in Fishkill Town Court on Monday morning for arraignment on a misdemeanor charge of endangering the welfare of a minor, and second-degree harassment, a violation, according to a news release Thursday from Police Chief Donald Williams.

Audience members said that a spectator lobbed something at Akon and that the singer asked the crowd to point out the culprit. A security guard picked out a 15-year-old and sent him up to the stage, where Akon hoisted him onto his shoulders and flung him into the crowd.

The boy landed on Abby Rosa, who told the Poughkeepsie Journal she was later found to have a concussion. She said she has hired a lawyer and spoken to Fishkill police.

The singer’s Manhattan lawyer, Benjamin Brafman, released a statement a few days after the June 3 concert at Dutchess Stadium saying there was no basis for criminal charges. A call to his office Thursday evening wasn’t immediately returned.

In April, Akon drew criticism for having on-stage simulated sex with a 14-year-old girl at a concert in Trinidad. He later apologized, saying he didn’t realize the girl was underage. The incident led Verizon to withdraw its sponsorship of Akon’s tour with Gwen Stefani, with whom he performs on the hit song “The Sweet Escape.”

Akon’s latest album, “Konvicted,” has sold more than 1 million copies in the United States. His hits include “Don’t Matter,” “I Wanna Love You” with Snoop Dogg and “Smack That” with Eminem. He won favorite male soul/rhythm & blues artist at the recent American Music Awards.

I’m just an ole chunk of coal but I’ll be a ahh, err . . . an ole chunk of coal

(who in the heck in their right mind would allow their kid to see this lower than animal life sing?)

The Power and Influence of Israel-Lobby Against American Interests - Unmasked

 

Read here full article by Justin Raimondo

The Israel Lobby: “We have an ‘unwritten contract’ with the American Media”

Progressive writer Philip Weiss reports on his excellent blog a speech by Andrea Levin, president of the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA):

” The American media is much, much more geared to understanding that there is an unwritten contract between them and us, and that is, that things should be factually accurate, and we get corrections all the time….”

What is this “Unwritten Contract“?

I’ll tell you what it is: it’s an Agreement to censor anything and everything that offends the Lobby and its glorified, sanitized view of Israel.

Here, after all, is a country (Israel) that practices apartheid, imprisons children, and was founded on ethnic cleansing and bigoted religious obscurantism – and yet they present themselves to the world as a valiant little “democracy,” a beleaguered outpost of “the West” in the midst of an Arab sea. It takes a lot of cosmetics to hide the true face of this dog, and that’s what CAMERA is all about – prettifying an increasingly ugly reality.

The Lobby reserves the right to censor any material that presents Israel in a more realistic light, and anyone who opposes them in their mission on behalf of a foreign power is smeared as an “anti-Semite.”

When National Public Radio (NPR) refused to kowtow to their demands for more favorable coverage of Israel, they mounted a vicious campaign of demonization that led to huge financial losses to the station.

NPR, which CAMERA called “National Palestine Radio” – a bit of racist snark that they feel powerful enough to get away with – soon mended its ways.

At a moment’s notice, CAMERA can unleash its winged monkeys to bury an offending media outlet in an avalanche of phone calls, e-mails, and angry missives via snail mail taking the “anti-Semitic” offender to task.

Weiss recorded Levin’s comments at an unusual event: a CAMERA conference on “Jewish defamers of Israel.”

Among the speakers, aside from Levin, were Indiana University professor Alvin Rosenfeld, whose “study” [.pdf] of the “Jewish defamers” targets Jews who question the Lobby’s motives and “unwritten contracts” with the American media.

Among the alleged “defamers”: former New York Times columnist Anthony Lewis and Henry Siegman, director of the U.S./Middle East Project at the Council on Foreign Relations.

Why single out Jews – a tactic that would get any other organization in a whole lot of trouble, at least from a public relations point of view? Because that’s precisely what Israeli ultra-nationalists like CAMERA can’t abide – someone they can’t smear as an anti-Jewish bigot raising his or her voice against the Lobby and speaking truth to the gathering power of the Israeli state.

The “anti-Semite” canard doesn’t work when applied to, say, Michael Lerner or Philip Weiss. And that’s their only defense: these days, it’s the only way they can prevent a real discussion about Israel’s relations with the U.S. and the Lobby’s distortion of American foreign policy.

So when that fails, they’re essentially left without any arguments, except the sort of special pleading that any advocate of dual loyalties engages in – and that is no longer quite enough.

Not when the price we must pay for our “loyalty” to Israel is yet another Middle Eastern war, this time with a much more populous nation, and at a moment when our military has been exhausted almost beyond repair.

That’s why the Lobby is getting desperate: what with the publication of John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt’s magisterial The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy and the increasingly vocal “Jewish defamers,” WASPy types like James Fallows feel empowered enough to write the following:

“To the (ongoing) extent that AIPAC – the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, which calls itself ‘America’s Pro-Israel Lobby’ – is trying to legitimize a military showdown between the United States and Iran, it is advancing its own concerns at the expense of larger American interests.

The people who are doing this are not from one ethnic group in the conventional sense but are mainly of one religion (Jewish).”

That Fallows was discussing the power of ethnic lobbies in general, including the Cubans and the Armenians, did not spare him the slings and arrows of the real defamers:

“Today Gabriel Schoenfeld of Commentary Magazine quotes only the part about AIPAC – and then asks why I am singling out the Jews!?!?! ‘Why is this game played only one way, with America’s Jews the primary target?’ … This makes me nostalgic for the comparative ‘honesty’ of the Chinese state media I’ve been dealing with recently.”

The Chinese state media has nothing on the Lobby’s mouthpieces, which are much more vicious and single-note than anything put out by the ChiComs: the only difference is that they don’t wield state power. Not that they aren’t trying, as Weiss reports:

“Someone in the audience asked if the Israeli government couldn’t take action. ‘Good question,’ Levin said.

‘Many many times we have urged in regard to American coverage – to really, really serious defamatory reports in the American media – we have urged the Israel government, whether it was the IDF or some other components of officialdom, to be involved. Times that we thought that legal actions could be taken.’ But evidently that couldn’t happen in Israel, where they have a ‘very free press.’”

Here is the totalitarian mentality of fanatic nationalists like Levin exposed for all to see:

She and her fellow fifth columnists are lobbying a foreign government to interfere with freedom of the press in America, on behalf of foreign interests.

It doesn’t get much more disgusting than that, now does it?

Yeah, they have a “very free press” in Israel – much freer than our own, thanks to groups like CAMERA.

In Israel, of course, newspapers like Ha’aretz regularly report on matters that offend the Lobby – such as, for example, the existence and unmitigated power of the Lobby itself – and CAMERA can’t do a damn thing about it because their influence there is minimal.

It’s only in the U.S. – where they are bold enough to have called on the Israeli government to take legal action against American media – that they have the kind of power they need to close down debate over U.S. policy in the Middle East.

Here we have the truth coming out of their own mouths – so now do you believe in the decisive power and influence of the Israel lobby?

Former president again targeted by protesters

For the second time in as many months a public appearance by former president Bill Clinton has been interrupted by 9/11 truth activists.

According to a AP report, Clinton, appearing at the State Theater in downtown Minneapolis as part of a Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, was interrupted by a group of protesters campaigning for a new investigation into the 9/11 attacks.

The AP reported:

Clinton’s 50-minute speech, which started about an hour behind schedule, was derailed briefly by several hecklers in the audience who shouted that the 2001 terrorist attacks were a fraud. Rather than ignoring them, Clinton seemed to relish a direct confrontation.

“A fraud? No, it wasn’t a fraud,” Clinton said, as the crowd cheered him on. “I’ll be glad to talk to you if you shut up and let me talk.”

When another heckler shouted that the attacks were an “inside job,” Clinton took even greater umbrage.

“An inside job? How dare you. How dare you. It was not an inside job,” Clinton said. “You guys have got to be careful, you’re going to give Minnesota a bad reputation.”

The confrontation follows an incident last month during which members of the protest group We Are Change concealed a small PA system at a Clinton book signing.

In addition to declaring 9/11 to be an inside job, the activists proceeded to tell the audience in attendance that Bill Clinton has attended meetings of the secretive elite policy making Bilderberg group and that he actively works with internationalist lobbying group The Council on Foreign Relations.

At this previous gathering Clinton remained silent.

Watch the video: LINK

Rams Lineman Terrell Arrested, Cut From Team

A now former St. Louis Rams player remained in a Texas jail Tuesday night. Claude Terrell, 25, was charged with felony assault, for allegedly beating his wife in Webster, Texas, near Houston. He could face 2 to 10 years in prison if convicted.

The Rams cut Terrell from the team after the news broke; a team official citing on-field performance issues for the move, not the arrest.

The Webster police chief said authorities in St. Louis also issued a warrant for Terrell’s arrest for something that happened before he left town. There was no word on what that was as of news time Tuesday night.

Court records from Texas showed Terrell’s been heading down a road from the football field in St. Louis to a Texas jail almost since he got here. It could turn out to be a one-way trip after Terrell allegedly kicked his wife in the face, breaking her nose, shortly before 2:00 a.m. in the parking lot of the Hampton Inn in Webster.

” …grabbed her by the hair, dragged through the lobby out the front door,” said Webster Police Chief Ray Smiley.

He said Terrell, his wife and two children were staying at the La Quinta Inn next door; Terrell’s wife fled after the two had a verbal altercation in their room, hiding behind the counter at the Hampton Inn; Terrell found her there.

“As they got into the parking lot, the victim tells us she through herself on the ground so he couldn’t take her any place,” Smiley said. “Then as she was laying on the ground, he turned around and kicked her in the face.”

He said Terrell’s wife feared for her life.

Court records pointed to possible reasons why. They showed the 25-year old 2005 4th round draft pick of the Rams had previously been charged for earlier assaults on a family member, along with trespassing, even kidnapping; all charges dropped except an assault, for which he was on probation.

“He violated his probation in St. Louis. St. Louis issued an arrest warrant for him for violation of his probation,” Smiley said.

Suspended Atlanta Falcons quarterback Michael Vick has put his lakefront suburban Atlanta estate on the market for 4.5 million dollars.

A listing posted at Realtor.com says the embattled sports figure’s property at Sugarloaf Country Club in Duluth has seven bedrooms, eight and a half baths and has an estimated monthly mortgage payment of $23,206.

Gwinnett County property records show Vick purchased the home in April of 2005 for 3.7 million dollars. His yearly tax bill on the 1.5-acre estate is $26,720.

Vick pleaded guilty in August to federal charges of bankrolling a dogfighting ring in Virginia. He is scheduled to be sentenced December 10 in the federal dogfighting case.

He is expected to get at least a year in prison. He’s also facing two state-level felony dogfighting charges in Virginia, which carry possible sentences of up to five years each.

He was suspended indefinitely without pay by the NFL, besides losing millions in lucrative endorsement deals, most notably with Nike.

—————————-

The White people who enabled this ghetto trash nigger should be slapped at the ticket window after they bought their tickets but before the tickets were set on fire. You people are disgusting!

***One and a half acres, nigger funk throughout, an above ground pool (on a $4.5 Mil estate), trash spewn everywhere, areas without grass, un-seaworthy boats stored outside and parked in the yard, nigger funk everywhere, mud all over the driveway, a rock drive past the fenced area, nigger funk all over, a propane tank left out in the open, a nigger-rigged and crooked fence that‘s about to fall over, dog carcasses buried everywhere . . . $4.5 million? FU NIGGER! - What? — > Are You CRAZY!!!!?

Nothing abuses animals like third worlders. I know of no third world nation that has laws to protect animals. Only White and first rate nations do. Third worlders abuse goats, chickens (cocks-roosters), dogs and any and everything in between. And nothing deserves to be abused and tormented. Especially by a tribe of lowly niggas or aztecs for their sole enjoyment and sport of placing bets while yelping as one animal maims or kills another. I will also add, the animals we use as food in America are inhumanely slaughtered. These animals could be euphemized prior to slaughtering to save it any pain. But because we live under jewish rule, we slaughter our animals under jewish law. The kosher method of slaughtering animals is to cut it’s throat while alive and watch as it slowly bleeds to death.

When I was a small child one of the worst things I had ever seen was the shooting of animals at my grandparents farm. Every once in awhile my grandfather would just walk up to one, say a few words to it, rub it a little bit and then shoot it in the head. I always protested but to no avail. He said he had to kill it because the animal was suffering - it was either too sick or too old. I thought back of how men would shoot their horses for the same reason, the animal was too sick, too old or had wounds/injuries that would never heal. I finally realized they were doing the best they could for the animal, rather than allow it to suffer for long periods of time, they shot it to relieve it any more pain. As hard as it was for me to understand as a child, I finally did - it was the humane thing to do.

On the other hand, I saw animals either shot, cut or their necks rung while being slaughtered for food. It didn’t matter the suffering in these cases. But, I understood, what had to be done had to be done. That was then, this is now, in this modern world, there is no rhyme nor reason to allow unnecessary suffering of animals, even the ones we use as food - at least not in the slaughtering process. And there’s certainly no reason for these nigs and spigs to hold dog-fighting and cock-fighting contest on our soil. This is a first rate nation, if these third worlders are too stupid to understand that, send their brown or black asses to a country that allows it, while denying them the right to return. And the ancient jewish method of Kosher slaughter? - exactly how is that important to American or to Americans? It’s not, these jews have a country, remember, they stole Palestine - time to ship these jews to that land and change the laws on our slaughtering process. There is no reason to allow our nation to regress back into jungle or even jewish law. Besides that, dogs are more useful than niggers, goats are smarter than spics and cocks? well, I’d like to shove a black one up a jew’s @#%!

Look White people - here’s what your tickets paid for — >

***One report stated the house sets on 1.5 acres while another stated 15 acres - more than likely the property sets on a 15 acre plot.

—————————-

Please, please, I beg you - don’t let that nigger take me outta here!

No chit nigger! - here’s a five! - jjjj ju just stay away from me - no jive!

Caught on tape - an entire tribe of useless, callous niggers torturing useful animals. Sets them of fire, throws large rocks at them, and then watches as they suffer and die. I can’t help but think of how they cornered John Dillinger in that alley and pumped him full of lead. Most of the shots hit him in the back as he sought to flee. Or how those scoundrels in the 1930’s hid in the bushes and ambushed Bonnie and Clyde while slaughtering them unmercilessly while calling it justice. And these GD evil, hideous and sadistic niggers, who are fifty times more corrupt and a hundred times more wicked than the three people mentioned previously, walk our streets unmolested? Please do tell, how do we, as a people, allow these futile, worthless and appalling beasts to live? I can’t help but wonder what PETA will say about this (tongue in check).

Video here

—————————-

A few more cases of nig-spig on animal here

< — Click above to see the below — >

Lower than sub-human niggers cook a puppy in an oven

Ape-man shoots, burns and beats a small dog

Spic caught sexing it up with a dog

Spic Caught Sexing It Up With A Female Dog

Useless lowdown nigger-beast hired as a “cop” charged with killing a very useful animal

A much hated, useless beast, locks lovable, useful animals in a basement to starve to death and die

Nasty, nasty, hideous, horrible, decrepit, UGLY NIGGERS severed a dog’s hind leg!! WTF is the matter with these no good creatures?!

Caught on tape - an entire tribe of useless, callous niggers torturing useful animals. Sets them of fire, throws large rocks at them, and then watches as they suffer and die.
(Last story - bottom of page)

Nigger rapes a dog in a nig breeding grounds area

Nigger abuses a 7-week old puppy

Evil nigger starves a dog to death

—————————-

Hold still nigger . . .

Caught!

——————-

Don’t forget, nigger mansion for sale . . .

Rapper T.I., whose real name is Clifford Harris Jr., is scheduled for a 10:30 bond hearing at the Federal Courthouse in downtown Atlanta.

Earlier this week, a grand jury passed down three indictments against Harris. He is charged with possessing unregistered machine guns and silencers, unlawfully possessing machine guns, and being a convicted felon in possession of firearms.

U.S. Attorney David Nahmias said ATF agents didn’t target the famous rapper, but that’s where the evidence led them. Investigators say Harris asked his bodyguard to buy machine guns and silencers for him. Other guns were allegedly found in Harris’ College Park home.

Friday’s bond hearing before United States Magistrate Judge Alan Baverman is expected to draw a large crowd. After fans and media packed the courtroom during Harris’ initial appearance, plans have been made to move the bond hearing to a bigger courtroom.

Oh Lordy, Mychal Bell, One of those poor, persecuted and oppressed blacks from Jena Louisiana is back in Jail.

Oh boo-hoo, what can a poor black boy do? Dat mean ole judge be pickin on him. Apparently the first rally had no real effect on this judge, I hope the dusky members of our society riot, oops I mean rally again.

‘Jena Six’ Teen Mychal Bell Back in Jail

LINK - Politically Correct Apostate

WORLD CONQUEST THROUGH WORLD JEWISH GOVERNMENT

THE PROTOCOLS
OF THE LEARNED ELDERS
OF ZION
Visiting “The Protocols”

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Preface
Introduction
Who are the Elders?
Protocol I The Basic Doctrine
Protocol II Economic Wars
Protocol III Methods of Conquest
Protocol IV Materialism Replaces Religion
Protocol V Despotism and Modern Progress
Protocol VI Take-Over Technique
Protocol VII World-Wide Wars
Protocol VIII Provisional Government
Protocol IX Re-education
Protocol X Preparing for Power
Protocol XI The Totalitarian State
Protocol XII Control of the Press
Protocol XIII Distractions
Protocol XIV Assault on Religion
Protocol XV Ruthless Suppression
Protocol XVI Brainwashing
Protocol XVII Abuse of Authority
Protocol XVIII Arrest of Opponents
Protocol XIX Rulers and People
Protocol XX Financial Programme
Protocol XXI Loans and Credit
Protocol XXII Power of Gold
Protocol XXIII Instilling Obedience
Protocol XXIV Qualities of the Ruler

Back to Table of Contents/ . . .

LINK

THE HILARIOUS AUSCHWITZ STORY.

On January 17, 1945, when the Germans evacuated Auschwitz, 67,012 prisoners remained (plus another, thousand or so, in the camp hospital (there is a 217-page report, written by the Jewish Auschwitz physicians Lebovits, Weil, Reich and Bloch, that records the names, nearly all of them Jews, of those in the Auschwitz hospital at the time of the Soviet liberation)).

Now instead of killing all 67,012, plus, prisoners, the Germans left about 7,650 prisoners at Auschwitz to be liberated by the Soviets, and marched the rest to other concentration camps.

The great majority of these people survived, becoming “holocaust survivors.”

Amazing isn’t it,… that the evil Nazis who had been “mass-killing millions of Jews” didn’t bother to finish off this last bunch.

Don’t you think that this is a rather strange thing for the Nazis to do, leaving some 70,000 witnesses to “genocide”.

Even stranger, is that the Jewish prisoner, Elie Wiesel states in his book “Night” that when the Germans evacuated Auschwitz, he was given the option of staying at the hospital, with his father registered as a patient, to await the Soviets, or join the evacuation with the “mass-murdering” Nazis.

Guess what? He chose to leave with the “mass-murdering” Nazis, taking his father with him.

Isn’t it funny,… that the Jew Elie Wiesel (whose book describes horrendous Nazi “mass-killings” of Jews at Auschwitz) should choose to go with the very same Nazis that had been “mass-killing” Jews, rather than wait for the Soviets.

“The choice was in our hands. For once we could decide our fate for ourselves. We could both stay in the hospital, where I could, thanks to my doctor, get him (his father) entered as a patient or nurse. Or else we could follow the others. ‘Well, what shall we do, father?’ He was silent. ‘Let’s be evacuated with the others,’ I told him.”

Quote from “Night” by Elie Wiesel.

Another strange thing about Elie Wiesel’s account of life at Auschwitz is that he never, not even once, mentions gas chambers.

In his version of the fiction, the Jews were burnt alive in huge pits, with the fat from the bodies scooped up to make soap.

Now, since human bodies don’t burn, we know that this is a lie, unless you believe that the Germans carved down all the forests of Poland to provide wood for the fires that roasted the 4 million (errrr,… that’s right it is now 1.5 million).

And even then there is the little problem regarding fires in pits,… they tend to go out due to a lack of oxygen,… but why let a few facts get in the way of a good story.

There is another account of happenings at Auschwitz on January 17th, 1945, from the book “Survival in Auschwitz,” by Primo Levi.

Primo Levi said “It was not a question of reasoning: I would probably also have followed the instinct of the flock (the evacuees) if I had not felt so weak: fear (of the unknown/Russians?) is supremely contagious, and its immediate reaction is to make one try to run away (WITH the evacuees and the “mass murdering” Nazis).” Comment in parenthesis added.

So Primo Levi was also given the choice of staying or leaving. His “weakness” caused him to await the Soviets, even though he was fearful of the outcome.

Levi states that 800 others choose to remain in Auschwitz, and 20,000 choose to go (with the “mass-murdering Nazis”).

His numbers do not quite add up, but clearly, as a prisoner he could only roughly estimate these, and he would only know about numbers in his particular camp (among the many at Auschwitz).

Otto Frank, the father of Anne Frank, was being treated for typhus in the camp hospital at this time. He too, has stated that prisoners were given the choice of whether to stay in the camp, or join the evacuation. Otto was too sick to leave.

LINK HERE

Category: News & Opinion (General)  Topic: International Affairs
	Synopsis: JEW MATH (A QUICK PROOF THAT THE HOLOCAUST STORY IS A LIE).
	Source: http://guardian.150m.com/
	Published: January 1, 2001  Author: guardian
	For Education and Discussion Only.  Not for Commercial Use.

Jew Math (A Quick Proof that the Holocaust Story is a Lie).

The HolyCo$t fable has a few math problems:

1948 (till 1990) Version of the fable:

Total number of Jews supposedly killed by the Nazis = 6,000,000

Total number supposedly killed at Auschwitz = 4,000,000
Number of Jews supposedly killed at Auschwitz = 3,000,000
Number of Jews supposedly killed outside of Auschwitz = 6,000,000 - 3,000,000 = 3,000,000

1990 (till present) Version of the fable:

Total number of Jews supposedly killed by the Nazis = 6,000,000

Total number supposedly killed at Auschwitz = 1,500,000
Number of Jews supposedly killed at Auschwitz = 1,000,000
Number of Jews supposedly killed outside of Auschwitz = 6,000,000 - 1,000,000 = 5,000,000

The problem is damn clear:

From 1948, till 1990, Jews claimed that 3,000,000 Jews were killed outside of Auschwitz.
Since 1990, Jews have claimed that 5,000,000 Jews were killed outside of Auschwitz.

Have Jews presented any evidence at all of the extra 2,000,000 “killings” outside of Auschwitz? Of course not.

This is a result of their reducing the number of Jews “killed” at Auschwitz by 2 million, while refusing to reduce the overall total of 6,000,000 claimed Jew deaths.

Again, do Jews have any documentation at all, for these extra 2 million “murders” outside of Auschwitz? Or did they just make up the number, like they clearly made up the pre-1990, 4 million “murders” at Auschwitz, figure.

So are Jews NUTS, or just NOT very good at math.

Another Plaque showing the 4 million LIE.

These plaques were on display at Auschwitz from 1948 until 1990 (note the “4 million” victims).

A Plaque showing the 1.5 million LIE.
Another Plaque showing the 1.5 million LIE.

These plaques are currently on display at Auschwitz (English and German). Note the dramatically reduced number of victims, now only 1.5 million (anderthalb millionen in German).

A casual reduction in the number of deaths by some 2.5 million.

Deaths at Auschwitz drop by a whopping 2.5 million, but 6,000,000 dead Jews, remains the same.

Since, everyone believed the FALSE “4 million died at Auschwitz” fable anyway, why did the Jews change the story in 1990?

In 1989, the Soviets released (some of) the German documentation, death certificates, roll-calls, cremation lists, etc, that they had found at Auschwitz, in January 1945. The Germans had simply left this documentation when they evacuated. The Soviets, came across it and conveniently “lost it” in their archives for some 45 years. In 1989, Gorbachev presented it to the Red Cross who then “lost it” in archives in Arolsen, Germany.

Although, the Jews have made sure the public is not allowed to see the documentation, its broad outline became known to enough people, so that the old lies were no longer sustainable, hence the change of fable in 1990.

LINK HERE